Skip to content

Fix a Map.keys() method-call regression #8597 left in the SGB contract test - #8781

Closed
gunbai-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-sgb-contract-test-keys-nickname
Closed

gunbai-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-sgb-contract-test-keys-nickname

Conversation

@gunbai-bot

@gunbai-bot gunbai-bot Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Test plan

  • required-ci witness floor passes on this PR

…t test

gunbc#8726 deleted the keys/values/has method-form nicknames in favor of the
free function map_keys(...); gunbc#8597 (landed same day) added two new
call sites in this file still using the deleted .keys() method form,
breaking required-CI's floor for every PR merged against main after it
(observed independently on #8742 and #8773, neither of which touches this
file). Line 461 in the same file already uses the correct map_keys(...)
form -- these two call sites are now consistent with it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@gunbai-bot

gunbai-bot Bot commented Aug 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing as duplicate of #8780 (opened 2 minutes earlier, byte-identical fix) — sent from sharp-badger-802

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants