🟡 Dissolution Burn-Down — STANDING manager lane (operator-directed briansrls 2026-05-18). Persistent for the whole dissolution program. FIRST ACTION: create your own closeout leaf-task (dashboard-ops work-items create '🟡 burn-down lane closeout') so this role does NOT auto-close when children fini

[briansrls]

Auto-opened by session-dashboard for session jolly-ibex-599.
Pushing to session/jolly-ibex-599 advances this PR.

Worker attestation

Before flipping this PR to ready for review, confirm each item:

• Title describes the change (not the session id or branch).
• PR body summarises what and why (replace the TODO below).
• Tests run: name the command (e.g. npm test, cargo test) and the result.
• If this closes a work item, the body contains a Closes #N directive.
• No commits on this branch are surprises (no fork/cherry-pick I did not make).
• No secrets / credentials / large binaries staged.

Summary

TODO: replace this paragraph with one or two sentences naming the change and its motivation. Reviewers read this first.

Test plan

• TODO: list the commands that ran (or "no tests changed; relied on CI") and the outcome.

[briansrls]

Worker verification (claude dashboard review @ current PR head b329a34f)

Re-read src/v4/BRIEF_TEMPLATE.md on this branch: the BURN-DOWN OUTPUT BAR block is exactly the docs-only addition described — Practices 7 (projection not enumeration), 8/9 (fact-bundle / no-prose, DECISIONS.md authority), 4 (dissolution dispositions with 🔴/🟡/🟢 legend tied to #3244; Practice 10 called out as the review class for dispositions), plus the manager pre-gate line. Numbering and cross-refs point at docs/modeling-discipline.md rather than inventing a parallel rubric. No code change warranted; finding is valid and already satisfied on-tree.

Merge readiness (same instant): GitHub mergeable: MERGEABLE, mergeStateStatus: CLEAN, required checks pass (ci, affected, fmt; v2/v3/v4 skipped as expected for this diff). dashboard-ops reviews: 1/2 distinct dashboard approvals (claude only so far), 0 REQUEST_CHANGES — bar not fully green until a second distinct api-review lands (per lane rule). Per TEMPORARY POLICY: no gh pr merge from jolly-ibex-599 — stopping here for operator queue.

— sent from jolly-ibex-599

[briansrls]

Worker verification (codex dashboard review @ b329a34f)

Spot-checked the changed block in src/v4/BRIEF_TEMPLATE.md against the cited governance docs at intent level (not re-auditing unchanged repo text): the burn-down bullets cite docs/modeling-discipline.md Practices 4 / 7–10 by number and role, add a manager pre-gate operational line, and do not introduce alternate rubric names, new substrate, or hand-Rust. That matches codex’s “narrowly scoped / consistent with pinned rubric / no concrete violation on changed lines” read. No code change.

Merge readiness (same instant): dashboard-ops reviews → ready: true, 2/2 distinct approvals (claude, codex), 0 REQUEST_CHANGES; GitHub mergeable: MERGEABLE, mergeStateStatus: CLEAN, CI passing on head b329a34f. Per TEMPORARY POLICY: no gh pr merge from jolly-ibex-599 — lane stops here; operator may take the merge.

— sent from jolly-ibex-599

[briansrls]

Review metadata

• Provider / model: codex / unknown
• Commit: b329a34f · Trigger: schedule
• Thinking: 137s wall

---

Non-blocking — Strengths

• src/v4/BRIEF_TEMPLATE.md The docs-only change matches the PR-head ten-practice modeling-discipline vocabulary and preserves v4 zero-deferral/no-prose intent.

✅ No blocking concerns.

[briansrls]

Worker response (codex api-review comment @ b329a34f, GitHub thread)

Cross-checked src/v4/BRIEF_TEMPLATE.md on PR HEAD: the burn-down block is still docs-only, references Practices 4 / 7–10 via docs/modeling-discipline.md (shared numbering + 🔴/🟡/🟢 legend tied to #3244), and reinforces zero-deferral / no-prose intent without inventing a parallel rubric — consistent with codex’s “non-blocking strengths / no blocking concerns” read. No code change.

Merge readiness (same instant): dashboard-ops reviews → ready: true, 2/2 distinct approvals (claude, codex), 0 REQUEST_CHANGES; GitHub mergeable: MERGEABLE, mergeStateStatus: CLEAN, ci / affected / fmt green on this head. Per TEMPORARY POLICY: no gh pr merge from jolly-ibex-599 — stopping for operator queue.

— sent from jolly-ibex-599

[briansrls]

Review metadata

• Provider / model: codex / unknown
• Commit: b4d9e925 · Trigger: schedule
• Thinking: 43s wall

---

✅ The provided PR diff is empty, so there are no changed lines to review and no blocking concerns.

[briansrls]

Worker verification (codex api-review @ b4d9e925, empty diff)

Checked GitHub’s PR diff against the current baseRefOid (e7b8a8d68…) / headRefOid (b4d9e925…): gh pr diff --name-only is empty — codex’s “no changed lines” read is accurate. The branch tip is origin/main + merge commits only; the substantive src/v4/BRIEF_TEMPLATE.md burn-down bar is already present on main (e.g. BURN-DOWN OUTPUT BAR at ~L44), so there is nothing left to patch on this PR head relative to the updated base.

Disposition: finding accepted as valid / non-actionable — no commit (a no-op diff cannot be “fixed” without introducing unrelated churn).

Merge readiness (same instant): dashboard-ops reviews → ready: true, 2/2 distinct approvals (claude, codex), 0 REQUEST_CHANGES; GitHub mergeable: MERGEABLE, mergeStateStatus: CLEAN, checks passing. Operator choice: merge (no-op merge commit) to retire the standing branch, or close as superseded-by-main if you want zero merge noise — either is coherent; no gh pr merge from jolly-ibex-599 per TEMPORARY POLICY.

— sent from jolly-ibex-599

[briansrls]

Review metadata

• Provider / model: codex / unknown
• Commit: e7e2ebf2 · Trigger: schedule
• Thinking: 30s wall

---

✅ No changed lines are present in the supplied PR diff, so there are no reviewable thesis or invariant concerns.

[briansrls]

Worker verification (current PR head e7e2ebf2, codex schedule review)

Re-checked against live GitHub + local git diff origin/main...origin/session/jolly-ibex-599: no file changes (same as API additions/deletions = 0 and empty gh pr diff --name-only). The codex finding (“no changed lines in the supplied PR diff”) is accurate — there is nothing to patch for thesis/invariant drift on this head.

Merge readiness (re-eval, no merge): mergeable/mergeStateStatus = MERGEABLE / CLEAN; latest ci/fmt/affected checks SUCCESS; no REQUEST_CHANGES reviews in the thread. Api-review gate: GitHub reviewDecision is still null; the three [api-review] provider:codex posts are all COMMENTED (not APPROVED), including the legacy “no blocking concerns” / empty-diff text. Per the standing bar (≥2 distinct api-review artifacts with openai-pro weighted), this PR still lacks any visible openai-pro review — queue that or confirm operator waiver before treating api-review as satisfied. Per current policy, not running gh pr merge here (operator merges in parallel).

— sent from jolly-ibex-599