Gate #100 project_github_actions_landed closure shape ambiguous at HEAD: r3-program-plan.md:327 marks row DECLARED+TEXT-RATCHETED (with full emit-back/per-arm body deferred to gate #98's scope), but r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:103 already claims CONSUMER_LANDED+PASSING (PR #2774; §1.8 ro

[briansrls]

Auto-opened by session-dashboard for session sleek-owl-368.
Pushing to session/sleek-owl-368 advances this PR.

Worker attestation

Before flipping this PR to ready for review, confirm each item:

• Title describes the change (not the session id or branch).
• PR body summarises what and why (replace the TODO below).
• Tests run: name the command (e.g. npm test, cargo test) and the result.
• If this closes a work item, the body contains a Closes #N directive.
• No commits on this branch are surprises (no fork/cherry-pick I did not make).
• No secrets / credentials / large binaries staged.

Summary

TODO: replace this paragraph with one or two sentences naming the change and its motivation. Reviewers read this first.

Test plan

• TODO: list the commands that ran (or "no tests changed; relied on CI") and the outcome.

[briansrls]

Review metadata

• Provider / model: openai-pro / gpt-5-5-pro
• Commit: d81b0909 · Trigger: manual
• Comparison: main @ 030c75e3 ... session/sleek-owl-368 @ d81b0909
• Conversation: View conversation

---

1. Story of the diff

This PR corrects a planning-ledger mismatch in docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md: the dependency graph had been treating gate #100, project_github_actions_landed, as CONSUMER_LANDED + PASSING, but the diff now records that as an overclaim and reclassifies #100 as DECLARED + TEXT-RATCHETED only. The load-bearing move is that it separates the already-present declaration/text ratchet from the still-unclosed full-file type-check, per-arm body, and .dag-authoritative emit-back work, explicitly keeping that closure paired with gate #98 (docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:37, :105, :111). It also updates the adjacent status snapshot for #103 from OPEN to CONSUMER_LANDED + PASSING based on the canonical §1.8 row and landed PR stack, so the T-WAD snapshot no longer has stale sequencing language around Slice 7 (docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:109, :111).

2. Invariant categories

1. LAYER MODEL (substrate vs implementation).

N/A — this is a docs-only dependency-graph correction; it does not touch substrate types, Dag, cross-pass carrier shape, or implementation code. The diff’s only changed file is docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md.

1. INVARIANTS.md + modeling-discipline.md.

Compliant — P2 single authority / P3 fail-closed planning language / P5 tracked bridge discipline are handled by refusing to let a text ratchet masquerade as a landed consumer: the new #100 row says the existing receipt “pins source text only” and is “not” a full type-check or authoritative emit-back consumer (docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:37, :105). That matches the invariant that every fact lives in one authoritative place and that scaffolds need explicit dissolution paths rather than becoming steady state. chatgpt-review-9a6ec070-1526-47…

chatgpt-review-9a6ec070-1526-47…

1. CODING.md.

N/A — no Rust implementation was changed; CODING.md applies to Rust implementation style in src/v3/compiler/src/, while this PR only edits a planning document. chatgpt-review-bd9c9a0c-ca7a-47…

1. TESTING.md.

N/A — no executable behavior changed and no new test harness was needed. The diff explicitly avoids claiming test coverage it does not have by classifying #100’s receipt as text-only and leaving full-file type-check / emit-back closure to #98 (docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:105). That is consistent with the broader testing direction that real verification should eventually be .dag TestClaim data rather than hand-maintained assertions. chatgpt-review-f4f1ee3b-6147-4f…

1. LOCKED DESIGN DECISIONS.

N/A — the diff does not alter a locked design document or change substrate/design commitments. It updates one dependency-graph status snapshot to point back to the canonical §1.8 state.

1. TRACKED vs UNTRACKED DEBT.

Compliant — the remaining #100 debt is bounded and named: the diff records the current state as DECLARED + TEXT-RATCHETED, names the existing text-only receipt, states what is missing, and gives the dissolution trigger: #98-scope emit-back/per-arm closure (docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:37, :105, :111). That is a tracked bridge, not an unbounded scaffold.

2.5. Top-down PM intent review

Compliant — this PR preserves the highest-level T-WAD / pure-bootstrap intent by preventing a planning artifact from telling workers that the GitHub Actions projection is fully landed when only the declaration and text ratchet are in place. The thesis-level direction is that build/CI workflow modeling becomes .dag-authored, structurally validated, and ultimately free of hand-maintained parallel authority; this diff narrows #100 to the actually landed declaration/text receipt and keeps the real emit-back closure attached to #98 rather than silently converting a scaffold into completion (docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:37, :105, :111). chatgpt-review-619f055c-bb61-41…

I did not find a diff-cited PM mismatch. The one semantic broadening in the diff is #103 moving from OPEN to CONSUMER_LANDED + PASSING (docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md:109), but the line itself frames that as alignment to canonical §1.8 at HEAD rather than a new scope promise; without a contrary authority line in the attached context, I would not turn that into a finding.

3. Verdict

APPROVE. This PR is a narrow documentation correction that removes an overclaim, re-bounds #100 as text-ratcheted only, and names the remaining emit-back closure path instead of diluting it into a false PASSING state. No substrate, implementation, or testing-surface changes are introduced.

[briansrls]

Review metadata

• Provider / model: codex / unknown
• Commit: cdd5f5d8 · Trigger: schedule
• Thinking: 123s wall

---

Non-blocking — Strengths

• docs/r3-remaining-work-dependency-graph.md The #100 wording now preserves the distinction between text-ratcheted declaration and real CONSUMER_LANDED/PASSING closure under §1.8.

✅ No blocking concerns.