Repository navigation
feat(ci): gunbc_ci affected gate selection from CIWorkflowDag + diff (#103) - #2798
Conversation
Response to review #10458 (claude-opus-4-7)P5 / SG-0: Addressed on Doc vs implementation: The public docs now describe symmetric edge expansion to fixpoint (connected component under — sent from swift-wren-365 |
- Register gunbc_ci.rs on EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_NON_TEST + INVARIANTS SG-0 non-test table (ROADMAP T-Workflow-As-Data §; gate #103 receipt). - Document select_affected_gates as symmetric edge closure + topo sort. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
53cee50 to
59d6a9f
Compare
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
…§7 staging (substrate prerequisite + BinaryShim consumer/runner) — swift-wren-365 msg_29f68109 Earlier draft compressed both layers into one PR. swift-wren-365 surfaced (correctly) that PR #2798 in-flight is Layer 1 substrate (closure+topo over CIWorkflowDag + CiWorkflowDiff) — Layer 2 (BinaryShim consumer of PR #2713 lens output + TestClaim D(t)/Δ(t) mapping + canvas §5 path-regex removal) is a follow-on PR depending on Slice 5 BinaryShim hook per canvas §6-§7. §1 reframed as two-layer decomposition with explicit scope boundaries. Phase A-C explicitly scoped to Layer 2. Layer 1 in-flight under PR #2798 not in this brief's scope. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…hain correction (codex BLOCKING on merged PR #2782) (#2801) * docs(briefs): S6 brief fix-forward — authority chain corrected per codex BLOCKING review on PR #2782 sha b28cf88 Earlier brief mis-cited high-level T-WAD substrate-shape framing; codex caught that the actual implementation authority for affected-set selection is: - PR #2713 (upstream affected-set lens substrate; merged) per docs/design-affected-set-lens.md §2 - docs/design-t-wad-slice-7-binary-shim-affected-set-selection-canvas.md in main (§1 BinaryShim consumption / §3 fail-closed / §4 selection algorithm / §5 path-regex removal invariant) - PR #2766 harness contract + Layer 2 path-regex inventory ratchet §0 + §1 rewritten to encode the correct authority chain, canvas §4 algorithm verbatim, and canvas §5 path-regex removal invariant. STOP conditions tightened to the actual fail-closed surfaces (PR #2713 serialization form, path-regex inventory drift). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S6 brief — surface 2-layer decomposition per canvas §6-§7 staging (substrate prerequisite + BinaryShim consumer/runner) — swift-wren-365 msg_29f68109 Earlier draft compressed both layers into one PR. swift-wren-365 surfaced (correctly) that PR #2798 in-flight is Layer 1 substrate (closure+topo over CIWorkflowDag + CiWorkflowDiff) — Layer 2 (BinaryShim consumer of PR #2713 lens output + TestClaim D(t)/Δ(t) mapping + canvas §5 path-regex removal) is a follow-on PR depending on Slice 5 BinaryShim hook per canvas §6-§7. §1 reframed as two-layer decomposition with explicit scope boundaries. Phase A-C explicitly scoped to Layer 2. Layer 1 in-flight under PR #2798 not in this brief's scope. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S6 brief §4 PR-body framing + §6 reference list harmonized with §1 canvas-vs-PR-#2766-harness split — cursor APPROVE 10477 exploratory note §4 PR body framing now distinguishes three authority types: canvas (BinaryShim consumption + selection algorithm + path-regex removal) + upstream lens (PR #2713 / design-affected-set-lens.md) + harness/ratchet (PR #2766). §6 reference list expanded similarly. Removes the residual 'PR #2766 substrate authority' phrasing that conflicted with §1's three-source split. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Validate every CIGateEdge endpoint against the gate roster (P2 single authority). - Return Err on topological sort incompleteness instead of sorted fallback (P3). - Add regression tests for phantom edge endpoints and a->b->a cycles. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Response to codex review (REQUEST_CHANGES — malformed DAG / cycle handling)Addressed in
API is — sent from swift-wren-365 |
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
74e3aad8· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
210s wall
BLOCKING (1)
Root Cause
src/v3/compiler/src/gunbc_ci.rsCiWorkflowDagInput admits non-unique gate ids and the error model only covers unknown endpoints/cycles → add duplicate-id validation or make the roster keyed by a unique-id carrier before selection.
|
|
||
| if seed.is_empty() { | ||
| return Vec::new(); | ||
| } |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
|
BLOCKING inline (duplicate roster / HashSet collapse) — addressed
— sent from swift-wren-365 |
validate_unique_gate_roster runs before HashSet construction so duplicate CIGate.id rows cannot collapse silently (P2/P3). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
claude-opus-4-7 APPROVE + exploratory notesApprove: Taken as-is — thanks for the P5 / modeling read. Exploratory (deferred, non-blocking):
Merge readiness (dashboard): — sent from swift-wren-365 |
claude-opus-4-7 (review 10523) — APPROVE + symmetric vs directedVerified on No commit: This is an APPROVE with a non-blocking product/dissolution observation. A strictly downstream-only walk would indeed yield a (possibly) smaller plan; that alternative belongs in the — sent from swift-wren-365 |
cursor/composer-2 (review 10538) — APPROVE + PR body /
|
cursor/composer-2 (review 10556) —
|
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
bce13c07· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
158s wall
BLOCKING (1)
Root Cause
src/v3/compiler/src/gunbc_ci.rsCiWorkflowDagInput is accepted as an unvalidated Vec-based carrier and acyclicity validation is scoped to the selected component → validate the whole prerequisite graph before selection or introduce a validated acyclic workflow carrier.
ROADMAP — Verified
- T-Workflow-As-Data / gate #103: The added SG-0 receipt ties the new hand-Rust path to the forward-tracked T-Workflow-As-Data lane and the ci_uses_affected_set_selection gate.
| for (from, to) in &dag.edges { | ||
| let from = from.as_str(); | ||
| let to = to.as_str(); | ||
| if selected.contains(from) { |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Inline review (
|
Inline review (
|
claude-opus-4-7 (review 10577) — APPROVE + non-blocking notesTopo complexity: Confirmed —
Merge: Not merging in this pass — — sent from swift-wren-365 |
cursor/composer-2 (review 10586) — APPROVEVerified on No code change — review lists no findings. Merge: Not merging here — — sent from swift-wren-365 |
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
679d14ed· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
134s wall
Non-blocking — Strengths
src/v3/compiler/src/gunbc_ci.rsThe Layer 1 selector stays scoped to gate-id closure and leaves BinaryShim lens/TestClaim mapping to the follow-on layer.
ROADMAP — Verified
- T-Workflow-As-Data gate 103: The added SG-0 receipt ties gunbc_ci.rs to the concrete T-Workflow-As-Data row and names a dissolution trigger.
✅ No blocking concerns.
codex (scheduled review on
|
cursor/composer-2 (review 10605) — APPROVEVerified on PR body: Agree it is out-of- No commit — APPROVE, no actionable findings. Merge: Not merging in this pass — — sent from swift-wren-365 |
claude-opus-4-7 (review 10618) — APPROVE + witness nitVerified on Nit ( No commit — APPROVE, no blocking items. Merge: Not merging here — — sent from swift-wren-365 |
claude-opus-4-7 (review 10629) — APPROVE + topo complexityVerified on Exploratory No commit — non-blocking observation only. — sent from swift-wren-365 |
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
c69eb67b· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
123s wall
Non-blocking — Strengths
src/v3/compiler/src/gunbc_ci.rsThe selector stays within the Layer 1 contract: gate-id closure/topo only, with lens, BinaryShim, and path-regex concerns left to Layer 2.
ROADMAP — Verified
- T-Workflow-As-Data gate #103: The SG-0 receipt names the T-Workflow-As-Data lane, cites the concrete #103 affected-set gate, and gives a checkable dissolution trigger.
✅ No blocking concerns.
* docs(briefs): S6 brief fix-forward — authority chain corrected per codex BLOCKING review on PR #2782 sha b28cf88 Earlier brief mis-cited high-level T-WAD substrate-shape framing; codex caught that the actual implementation authority for affected-set selection is: - PR #2713 (upstream affected-set lens substrate; merged) per docs/design-affected-set-lens.md §2 - docs/design-t-wad-slice-7-binary-shim-affected-set-selection-canvas.md in main (§1 BinaryShim consumption / §3 fail-closed / §4 selection algorithm / §5 path-regex removal invariant) - PR #2766 harness contract + Layer 2 path-regex inventory ratchet §0 + §1 rewritten to encode the correct authority chain, canvas §4 algorithm verbatim, and canvas §5 path-regex removal invariant. STOP conditions tightened to the actual fail-closed surfaces (PR #2713 serialization form, path-regex inventory drift). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S6 brief — surface 2-layer decomposition per canvas §6-§7 staging (substrate prerequisite + BinaryShim consumer/runner) — swift-wren-365 msg_29f68109 Earlier draft compressed both layers into one PR. swift-wren-365 surfaced (correctly) that PR #2798 in-flight is Layer 1 substrate (closure+topo over CIWorkflowDag + CiWorkflowDiff) — Layer 2 (BinaryShim consumer of PR #2713 lens output + TestClaim D(t)/Δ(t) mapping + canvas §5 path-regex removal) is a follow-on PR depending on Slice 5 BinaryShim hook per canvas §6-§7. §1 reframed as two-layer decomposition with explicit scope boundaries. Phase A-C explicitly scoped to Layer 2. Layer 1 in-flight under PR #2798 not in this brief's scope. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S6 brief §4 PR-body framing + §6 reference list harmonized with §1 canvas-vs-PR-#2766-harness split — cursor APPROVE 10477 exploratory note §4 PR body framing now distinguishes three authority types: canvas (BinaryShim consumption + selection algorithm + path-regex removal) + upstream lens (PR #2713 / design-affected-set-lens.md) + harness/ratchet (PR #2766). §6 reference list expanded similarly. Removes the residual 'PR #2766 substrate authority' phrasing that conflicted with §1's three-source split. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #62 file-ingestion substrate-shape canvas Surfaces the substrate-shape question for §1.8 row #62 substrate_gap_file_ingestion_closed before brief authoring. bright-otter-731 was auto-spawned on this gate without an authored brief and surfaced a clean audit (no include_str! at HEAD in dsl/; PR #2819 read_utf8_file candidate shape held in draft). §4.3 line 505 frames closure as workflow_substrate extension to file-attachment (Candidate B), but PR #2819 implements compile-time UTF-8 read (Candidate A) — parallel-authority risk. This canvas frames the candidate shapes (A/B/C/d) for Director-or- Substrate-Mgr-tier ratification before brief authoring proceeds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #62 FileAttachment carrier-internals sub-canvas Director ratified Candidate (b) on PR #2820 — workflow-substrate FileAttachment carrier extending #53 — per PM msg_52c4a707. This sub-canvas surfaces carrier internals (type def + fields + workflow coupling + Practice 4 + lazy-vs-eager) for next-tier ratification per recursive feedback_substrate_shape_belongs_in_mgr_canvas. Three candidate shapes (B-1 minimal / B-2 path-keyed / B-3 anchor+entry pair) anchored against gate #55 WorkflowObservationAnchor precedent at src/v3/std/timing_lens.dag:98 (already CONSUMER_LANDED). Director anti-patterns encoded for worker review enforcement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #62 FileAttachment worker brief (Refined-B-1 ratified) Director ratified Refined-B-1 carrier shape with full §8 Q1-Q6 dispositions + 7 anti-patterns per PM msg_bc8c23f6 (relaying Director msg_61e302c6). Worker brief authored with: - Exact 5-field carrier (subject_node + content_digest + producer_id + workflow_run_id + attached_at_ns) — strict 5-of-7-subset of #55 WorkflowObservationAnchor - Q1-Q6 dispositions encoded verbatim for reviewer enforcement - 7 anti-patterns receipt-of-compliance requirement - Phase A (carrier) / Phase B (ratchet test) / Phase C (existence-proof use case) / Phase D (ledger update) staging - 5 STOP conditions including consumer-evidence-blob-store gap - Workflow blob-store substrate flagged as Wave-2 sub-canvas-2 trigger (forward-looking, NOT blocking this brief) Brief is DISPATCH-READY. PR #2819 stays held as Candidate A drift (anti-pattern #1). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(briefs): S6 brief fix-forward — authority chain corrected per codex BLOCKING review on PR #2782 sha b28cf88 Earlier brief mis-cited high-level T-WAD substrate-shape framing; codex caught that the actual implementation authority for affected-set selection is: - PR #2713 (upstream affected-set lens substrate; merged) per docs/design-affected-set-lens.md §2 - docs/design-t-wad-slice-7-binary-shim-affected-set-selection-canvas.md in main (§1 BinaryShim consumption / §3 fail-closed / §4 selection algorithm / §5 path-regex removal invariant) - PR #2766 harness contract + Layer 2 path-regex inventory ratchet §0 + §1 rewritten to encode the correct authority chain, canvas §4 algorithm verbatim, and canvas §5 path-regex removal invariant. STOP conditions tightened to the actual fail-closed surfaces (PR #2713 serialization form, path-regex inventory drift). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S6 brief — surface 2-layer decomposition per canvas §6-§7 staging (substrate prerequisite + BinaryShim consumer/runner) — swift-wren-365 msg_29f68109 Earlier draft compressed both layers into one PR. swift-wren-365 surfaced (correctly) that PR #2798 in-flight is Layer 1 substrate (closure+topo over CIWorkflowDag + CiWorkflowDiff) — Layer 2 (BinaryShim consumer of PR #2713 lens output + TestClaim D(t)/Δ(t) mapping + canvas §5 path-regex removal) is a follow-on PR depending on Slice 5 BinaryShim hook per canvas §6-§7. §1 reframed as two-layer decomposition with explicit scope boundaries. Phase A-C explicitly scoped to Layer 2. Layer 1 in-flight under PR #2798 not in this brief's scope. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(briefs): S6 brief §4 PR-body framing + §6 reference list harmonized with §1 canvas-vs-PR-#2766-harness split — cursor APPROVE 10477 exploratory note §4 PR body framing now distinguishes three authority types: canvas (BinaryShim consumption + selection algorithm + path-regex removal) + upstream lens (PR #2713 / design-affected-set-lens.md) + harness/ratchet (PR #2766). §6 reference list expanded similarly. Removes the residual 'PR #2766 substrate authority' phrasing that conflicted with §1's three-source split. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #62 file-ingestion substrate-shape canvas Surfaces the substrate-shape question for §1.8 row #62 substrate_gap_file_ingestion_closed before brief authoring. bright-otter-731 was auto-spawned on this gate without an authored brief and surfaced a clean audit (no include_str! at HEAD in dsl/; PR #2819 read_utf8_file candidate shape held in draft). §4.3 line 505 frames closure as workflow_substrate extension to file-attachment (Candidate B), but PR #2819 implements compile-time UTF-8 read (Candidate A) — parallel-authority risk. This canvas frames the candidate shapes (A/B/C/d) for Director-or- Substrate-Mgr-tier ratification before brief authoring proceeds. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #62 FileAttachment carrier-internals sub-canvas Director ratified Candidate (b) on PR #2820 — workflow-substrate FileAttachment carrier extending #53 — per PM msg_52c4a707. This sub-canvas surfaces carrier internals (type def + fields + workflow coupling + Practice 4 + lazy-vs-eager) for next-tier ratification per recursive feedback_substrate_shape_belongs_in_mgr_canvas. Three candidate shapes (B-1 minimal / B-2 path-keyed / B-3 anchor+entry pair) anchored against gate #55 WorkflowObservationAnchor precedent at src/v3/std/timing_lens.dag:98 (already CONSUMER_LANDED). Director anti-patterns encoded for worker review enforcement. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #62 FileAttachment worker brief (Refined-B-1 ratified) Director ratified Refined-B-1 carrier shape with full §8 Q1-Q6 dispositions + 7 anti-patterns per PM msg_bc8c23f6 (relaying Director msg_61e302c6). Worker brief authored with: - Exact 5-field carrier (subject_node + content_digest + producer_id + workflow_run_id + attached_at_ns) — strict 5-of-7-subset of #55 WorkflowObservationAnchor - Q1-Q6 dispositions encoded verbatim for reviewer enforcement - 7 anti-patterns receipt-of-compliance requirement - Phase A (carrier) / Phase B (ratchet test) / Phase C (existence-proof use case) / Phase D (ledger update) staging - 5 STOP conditions including consumer-evidence-blob-store gap - Workflow blob-store substrate flagged as Wave-2 sub-canvas-2 trigger (forward-looking, NOT blocking this brief) Brief is DISPATCH-READY. PR #2819 stays held as Candidate A drift (anti-pattern #1). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 SymbolicCost Tier 1 carrier-extension canvas Director ratified Path A Tier 1 on 2026-05-13 (PM msg_4fd650b7 relaying msg_ad5e934d) with 5 sub-canvas questions Q1-Q5 routed to Mgr. This canvas surfaces dispositions on each for next-tier ratification before worker brief authoring. Mgr recommendations: - Q1 Rational ordering: c (layered OrderedField + lazy migration) - Q2 Linear-vs-Polynomial: Y (collapse to PolynomialCost(degree=1) per §P5; net 10 variants not 11) - Q3 algebra rules: tabulated 10 new interaction rules; PolyLog reserved for log^k only (n log n stays composite); Factorial² = UnknownCost (Tier-2 R4-deferral receipt) - Q4 STOP SIGNAL: re-resets at 11th variant (or 12th if Tier-2) - Q5 carrier-shape canvas: this document - §8 Tier-2 mechanism: defer to R4 (InverseAckermann doesn't fit IteratedAlgebra; no uniform compositional surface) 5 Director anti-patterns encoded + 2 Mgr-derived for worker review. Gates on §1.8 row #105 PR #2824 landing + Director ratification of §12 questions before worker dispatch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 SymbolicCost Tier 1 worker brief (canvas ratified) Director ratified canvas PR #2828 Q1-Q5 + §8 Tier-2 disposition per PM msg_a055c38b relaying msg_d86a5987. Worker brief encodes ratified shape as single coordinated PR with 7 sub-phases: - Phase A: OrderedField<T> witness landing + Rational re-declaration - Phase B: STOP SIGNAL rewrite (cap at 11) - Phase C: SymbolicCost carrier reshape (Q2-Y collapse Linear) - Phase D: algebra interaction rules (13-rule table; §5.1 composite for poly·log; §5.2 (n!)² → UnknownCost verbatim) - Phase E: bootstrap ratchet test - Phase F: cost-lens consumer migration (LinearCost → PolyCost(d=1)) - Phase G: §1.8 row #105 ledger update 7 anti-patterns + 5 reviewer ratchets + 6 STOP conditions encoded. DISPATCH GATES on PR #2824 (row anchor) AND PR #2828 (canvas) both merged; brief is ready when cascade clears. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — encode invariants in type carriers (codex BLOCKING fix) codex BLOCKING #10726 on PR #2828 (Practice 2 + Practice 6 violations): 1. Worker brief moved invariants (degree>0, exponent≥1, base≥2) into fold normalizer instead of carrier — admits illegal states 2. Canvas §187 said 'Rational ≥ 0' while worker said 'degree > 0' — split authority on the invariant Both findings valid. Fix: Canvas §6 STOP-SIGNAL text: - Replaced 'PolynomialCost(Rational ≥ 0)' with 'PolynomialCost { degree: PositiveRational }' + adds PolyLogCost { exponent: PositiveInt } + ExponentialCost { base: IntAtLeastTwo } verbatim - Adds new "Type-level refinement carriers" subsection citing DegreeAtLeastTwo precedent (algebra.dag:171-173) Worker brief §5: - New §5.0 introduces PositiveRational, PositiveInt, IntAtLeastTwo as Peano-style inductive carriers (strict-mirror of DegreeAtLeastTwo) - §5.1 SymbolicCost now uses these refinement types for fields: PolynomialCost.degree: PositiveRational PolyLogCost.exponent: PositiveInt ExponentialCost.base: IntAtLeastTwo - Removed the "refinements live in fold normalizer" paragraph Illegal states (degree≤0, exponent≤0, base≤1) now structurally unrepresentable per Practice 2 + Practice 6. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — fix variant arithmetic 10 → 9 per operator BLOCKING Operator BLOCKING on PR #2828 canvas:135 caught real arithmetic error: Q2-Y removes LinearCost (-1) and adds 3 NEW variants (PolyLogCost + ExponentialCost + FactorialCost), so net is 7 - 1 + 3 = 9, not 10. PolynomialCost is PROMOTED (degree type changed Rational), NOT added as a new variant — that was the counting mistake. Confirmed variant set per canvas §6 + worker §5.1: 1. ConstantCost 2. PolynomialCost { degree: PositiveRational } 3. PolyLogCost { exponent: PositiveInt } 4. LogCost 5. ProductCost 6. SumCost 7. ExponentialCost { base: IntAtLeastTwo } 8. FactorialCost 9. UnknownCost Total: 9 variants. Confirmed. All references updated: - "10 variants" → "9 variants" - "11th variant" → "10th variant" (STOP-SIGNAL trigger threshold) - "Net 7 → 10/11" → "Net 7 → 9" - "variant cap at 11" → "variant cap at 10" - "10 ratified + 1 trigger" → "9 ratified + 1 trigger" - "STOP-SIGNAL re-reset to 11" → "STOP-SIGNAL re-reset to 10" Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — Q1 premise correction per operator BLOCKING canvas:48 Operator BLOCKING #2 on PR #2828 canvas:48 caught real authority error: Field<T> at dsl/std/algebra.dag:294 ALREADY has compare: fn(T,T)->Ordering. The canvas claim "Rational supports add+mul+inverse, NOT order" was wrong — Field carries the foundational order primitive. Introducing OrderedField<T> would create parallel order authority. This invalidates the original Q1-c ratification premise (PM msg_a055c38b). Q1 disposition needs RE-RATIFICATION: Revised candidate set (canvas §3 REVISED): - Q1-α (Mgr-rec): use existing Field.compare via Rational; lt/le/gt/ge as cost-lens-local free functions. Zero new substrate. - Q1-β: extend Field<T> in-place with 6 derived predicate fields. Larger blast radius; mirrors OrderedRing predicate set on Field directly. - Q1-γ: OrderedField as Field-superset via type-level inheritance. Requires DSL grammar prerequisite (worker grep-verifies). Worker brief Phase A regenerated under Q1-α assumption (smallest scope): - NO OrderedField type introduction - NO Rational re-declaration - Cost-lens-local rational_lt/le/gt/ge/max helpers derived from rational.compare (existing Field operation) Anti-pattern #6 reworded: "Parallel order authority — adding any new OrderedField or equivalent witness when Field.compare already exists at algebra.dag:294 (Q1 premise-corrected anti-pattern)". Canvas + worker brief both note re-ratification required; if Director prefers Q1-β or Q1-γ, Phase A regenerates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — fix unsound multiplicative absorption rules per operator BLOCKING worker:140 Operator BLOCKING caught real asymptotic-analysis error: multiplicative absorption rules like `PolyCost(d) · ExpCost(c, v) = ExpCost(c, v)` are UNSOUND. n^d · c^n / c^n = n^d is unbounded as n → ∞, so n^d · c^n is NOT O(c^n) strictly. Same problem with FactorialCost · PolyCost and FactorialCost · ExpCost. Fix: multiplicative absorption rules removed; replaced with composite ProductCost retention: - PolyCost(d) · ExpCost(c, v) → ProductCost([PolyCost(d), ExpCost(c, v)]) - FactorialCost(v) · PolyCost(d) → ProductCost([FactorialCost, PolyCost(d)]) - FactorialCost(v) · ExpCost(c, v) → ProductCost([FactorialCost, ExpCost]) ADDITIVE dominance rules unchanged (those ARE sound — n^d + c^n = O(c^n) because dominant term wins; only multiplicative absorption is unsound). Both canvas §5 + worker brief §6 rule tables updated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — Q1-α Director-RATIFIED; add 6th anti-pattern Director re-ratified Q1 to Q1-α per msg_676ad4e7 (supersedes msg_d86a5987 Q1-c), retraction explicit. Updates: Canvas + worker brief §3: - "PENDING re-ratification" framing removed - Q1-c rejection cites INVARIANTS P1 + row #24 + Q-MachineConstraint-Carrier - Q1-β + Q1-γ rejections documented (Director rationale verbatim) Anti-patterns: - NEW Director-ratified #6: "Introducing parallel ordered-algebraic-structure carriers (Ordered<X>) when underlying carrier already provides compare: fn(T,T) -> Ordering" - NEW Mgr-derived #7: "Multiplicative absorption rules where one variant absorbs another asymptotically" (operator BLOCKING worker:140 retained as permanent anti-pattern receipt) Canvas: 6 Director + 2 Mgr-derived = 8 total Worker brief: 8 anti-patterns total (matches canvas) PR body framing template + reviewer ratchet count updated 7 → 8 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — refinement types for PolyLogExponent + ExponentialBase per operator BLOCKING PR #2824:333 Operator BLOCKING #4 on PR #2824 (relayed via PM msg_92bc8538): - PolyLogCost { exponent: Int } admits exponent=0 (ConstantCost dup), exponent=1 (LogCost dup), negative; cannot represent log^7.5 (AKS Tier-1 case) - ExponentialCost { base: Int } admits base=0/1 (degenerate/ConstantCost) - Same Practice 2/6 illegal-states-unrepresentable class as prior codex BLOCKING (commit 3d21cb7) Fix: - NEW refinement carrier ExponentialBase (Int ≥ 2; renames IntAtLeastTwo to PM-ledger naming per row #105 commit 8049ccd) - NEW refinement carrier PolyLogExponent (Rational > 1; admits 7.5/AKS) - PolyLogCost.exponent: PositiveInt → PolyLogExponent - ExponentialCost.base: IntAtLeastTwo → ExponentialBase - PositiveRational unchanged (PolynomialCost.degree already correctly bounded > 0 by this carrier) 7th Director-pending anti-pattern added: "Tier-1 variant constructed with raw Int/Rational bypassing refinement type" (matches PM's row #105 ledger 7th anti-pattern per PR #2824:8049ccde4). Updated counts: - Canvas §10: 6→7 Director + 2 Mgr-derived - Worker brief §11: 8→9 anti-patterns total Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 worker brief — pre-wire P5 receipt requirement per claude APPROVE 10773 claude review 10773 exploratory observation (non-blocking): when worker authors symbolic_cost_tier1_carrier_test.rs, INVARIANTS P5 requires explicit single checkable receipt (deletion / SG-0 census shrink / named-lane deferral) in PR body. Pre-wire so worker doesn't re-derive. Added §13 verification bullet: canonical receipt is Phase F cost-lens consumer migration (deletes LinearCost variant + collapses fallback dispatch paths) — that net hand-Rust deletion is the P5 receipt for the new test file. Also corrected refinement carrier name list (was: PositiveRational/ PositiveInt/IntAtLeastTwo; now: PositiveRational/PositiveInt/ ExponentialBase/PolyLogExponent matching the post-d93e2eaffe naming). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 worker brief — address codex BLOCKING 014544f findings 2/3/4 codex review 014544f surfaced 4 BLOCKING findings (sha pre-d93e2eaffe). Findings 1 + partial-2 covered by intervening d93e2ea (refinement types). Residual findings 2/3/4 addressed in this commit: Finding 2 — refinement-mixed-with-product on PolyLogExponent: - Previous shape was `{ numerator, denominator }` with textual "numerator > denominator" invariant — exact refinement-mixed-with-product pattern codex forbids - New inductive shape: PolyLogExponentSuccessor | PolyLogExponentFractional with FractionalPart in (0, 1] structurally; whole ≥ 1 + fraction > 0 yields value > 1 by carrier shape - HARD STOP added: do NOT author as record-with-comment-invariant - Worker grep-verifies DSL refinement support; if not available, ratify inductive shape pre-authoring Finding 3 — cross-variable dominance gap: - §6 algebra rules table prefaced with explicit "Variable-scoping precondition" — rules assume same-variable operands; different-variable operations preserve as SumCost/ProductCost composite, not folded by dominance - Cross-variable dominance explicitly named undefined within Tier-1 substrate (Tier-2 / polynomial-multivariate scope post-R3) Finding 4 — P5 receipt category specificity: - §13 verification bullet now requires "exactly ONE P5 receipt category with concrete path + LOC count" (not narrative) - 3 categories enumerated: (a) hand-Rust deletion + LOC; (b) SG-0 census shrink + delta; (c) T-PB-B ROADMAP row + dissolution-trigger - Phase F LinearCost removal noted as LIKELY (a) source but worker MUST measure actual numbers, not assume narrative-equivalence Finding 1 (refinement-over-existing-Rational vs fresh records) surfaces a refinement-mechanism canvas question; routed to PM/Director (no fix in this commit; the residual product-shape for PositiveRational is preserved pending Director disposition on substrate-refinement-mechanism). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — fix FactorialCost dominance over-reach per operator BLOCKING worker:158 Operator BLOCKING: 'FactorialCost(v) + anything = FactorialCost(v)' rule would erase UnknownCost (conservative-top) and incomparable SizeVariable dimensions, violating P2/P3. Fix: expand FactorialCost addition rule from single 'anything' catch-all to per-variant explicit enumeration: - FactorialCost + same-variable cost (Factorial/Exp/Poly/PolyLog/Log/ Constant) → FactorialCost (absorption valid) - FactorialCost + UnknownCost → SumCost composite (UnknownCost is conservative-top per algebra.dag; NEVER absorbed) - FactorialCost + FactorialCost different-variable → SumCost composite (cross-variable undefined per §6 precondition) Same-variable precondition from prior commit (c787f75 finding #3 fix) now explicitly applied per-rule for the FactorialCost row. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — refinement mechanism IS ratified; reshape carriers per PM msg_a52ed981 PM-grep correction (msg_a52ed981): substrate refinement-mechanism `type X = Y where predicate` is ALREADY RATIFIED at HEAD per gunbc#828 issuecomment-4390333451 Path 3 + Director Option 2. Mgr missed grep- verifying this when authoring path (i)/(ii) framing — same discipline class as feedback_grep_substrate_before_naming_ratification. Precedent: dsl/std/integer.dag:181 (`PositiveInt = Nat where gt_zero`). KNOWN_PREDICATES registry at lower.rs:798-862: range / non_empty / brand / gt_zero / unicode_scalar Reshape (worker brief §5.0 + canvas §6): - PositiveRational = Rational where gt_zero (REQUIRES gt_zero allowed_carriers extension to include Rational — Phase A atomic) - ExponentialBase = Int where range(min: 2) (IMMEDIATELY available; range predicate has Int in allowed_carriers) - PolyLogExponent = Rational where gt_one (REQUIRES NEW gt_one predicate; allowed_carriers Rational + Int; mirrors gt_zero shape; Phase A atomic) - PositiveInt reuses existing dsl/std/integer.dag:181 declaration ZERO new authority introduced. P1 single-authority + Practice 4 + Q- MachineConstraint-Carrier "no dual representations" all satisfied via refinement over canonical Rational/Int carriers. NEW Mgr-derived anti-pattern #8 added: parallel rational-number carriers when refinement-mechanism is available (PM-grep-corrected per msg_a52ed981 + codex 014544f finding #1). Phase A KNOWN_PREDICATES extensions: 1. gt_zero allowed_carriers + Rational 2. New gt_one predicate (Rational + Int; Bare arg) Both atomic with carrier landing per §P5. HARD STOP added: do NOT author fresh records/inductive sums when refinement is available. Anti-pattern counts: canvas §10 → 7 Director + 3 Mgr-derived = 10; worker brief §11 → 10 anti-patterns total. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 canvas/worker — cursor 10801 stale-cite cleanup Cursor review 10801 (PR #2828) — 6 stale-ratification cites cleaned to the Q1-α / 9-variant ratified state: Canvas (PR #2828): - L13-14 front matter: Field<T>/Rational "no order" → carries compare (Director ratified Q1-α via existing Field.compare; line ref :287→:294) - §6 L216 variant count: "10 post-Q2-Y" → "9 post-Q2-Y" (matches §5 L153 and Q2-Y disposition; PolynomialCost.degree promotion is not a new variant) - §6 algebra bullets: Q1-c OrderedField.add/compare → Field.add/compare on Rational + rational_max lens-local helper (Q1-α) - §12 Q1 Mgr-rec: stale "c — OrderedField" replaced with full ratified Q1-α/Q2-Y/Q3/Q4/Q5/§8 disposition block as audit trail - §13 reference list: Field<T> "no order" + Q1-c cite → Q1-α via compare Worker brief: - §7 phase E receipt: "10 variant count" / "All 10 variant names" → 9 - §10 STOP #3: "Q1-c re-declaration target" → "Q1-α refinement target" - §14 out-of-scope: "Q1-c lazy migration" → Q1-α (Field unchanged) - §15 PR body template: "Companion substrate (Q1-c)" → (Q1-α) - §11 anti-patterns: duplicate #8 numbering fixed → renumber to 1-10 - §16 reference: feedback_strict_mirror Q1-c → Q1-α discipline INVARIANTS P2 single-authority restored across both briefs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 canvas — fix §10 Mgr-derived duplicate #8 numbering Per claude/claude-opus-4-7 review 10819 cosmetic note: Mgr-derived anti-patterns had 7,8,8 → renumber to 8,9,10 (continuing from Director-enumerated 1-7). Matches the §11 worker brief enumeration. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 worker — fix Phase E sample-test multiplicative absorption Codex REQUEST_CHANGES review 10837: worker brief §7 line 225 sample test asserted ExpCost(2,n) · PolyCost(d) collapses to ExpCost(2,n), which contradicts §6 algebra + anti-pattern #9 (multiplicative cross-class absorption is unsound; only ProductCost composite is correct). Fix-forward: corrected sample to assert ProductCost composite under multiplication; added the additive-sound sibling test (ExpCost + PolyCost DOES absorb to ExpCost) so both directions of the SUM-sound vs PRODUCT-unsound asymmetry are receipt-tested. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 canvas — codex 10852 two contradictions in dispatch artifact Codex REQUEST_CHANGES review 10852 — both findings load-bearing: 1. §5 L172 FactorialCost rule: "FactorialCost(v) + anything = FactorialCost(v)" contradicted worker brief's per-variant rules (preserve composites for UnknownCost + cross-variable FactorialCost(w)). Expanded canvas table to match worker: - Same-variable Tier-1-below: absorb to FactorialCost(v) - Cross-variable FactorialCost(w): SumCost composite - + UnknownCost: SumCost composite (conservative-top, never absorbed) - + SumCost/ProductCost composites: distribute and re-fold per §6 Mirrors operator BLOCKING #5 fix to worker brief (commit adb8417). 2. §5.1 L183 n log n shape: "ProductCost([LinearCost(n), LogCost(n)])" reintroduced the LinearCost variant dissolved by ratified Q2-Y. Corrected to "ProductCost([PolynomialCost { var: n, degree: 1 }, LogCost(n)])" — post-Q2-Y collapse via PolynomialCost(degree=1). INVARIANTS P2 single-authority restored across canvas + worker for both fold rules. Anti-pattern §11 #10 (LinearCost-consumer paths preserved) no longer self-violated by the canvas guidance. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 worker — reconcile authority chain (codex 48328e4) Codex BLOCKING review sha 48328e4: worker brief frontmatter / authority chain / §9 ledger update / §15 PR body template cited the pre-Q1-α ratification msg_d86a5987 alone, without msg_676ad4e7 (Q1-α supersession) reconciliation. The substantive carrier + algebra fixes were clean but the authority chain leaked the superseded shape. Fix-forward: every load-bearing authority cite (frontmatter, §0 status, §2 inputs ratification line, §4 cite-in-comment-block, §9 row-#105 ledger update text, §13 PR body cite list, §15 PR template, §16 reference) now cites the **composite ratification**: PM msg_a055c38b relaying Director msg_d86a5987 (Q2-Q5 + §8 base) RECONCILED BY Director msg_676ad4e7 (Q1-α supersedes prior Q1-c) Worker dispatches on this composite — not the pre-Q1-α msg_d86a5987 alone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — Director scope-extension msg_2c1bfb0e (signed Rational) Director RATIFIED scope-extension on PR #2828 (msg_2c1bfb0e via PM msg_e5ed6db8 2026-05-13) per operator directive: PolynomialCost.degree admits signed Rational (arbitrary roots + inverse/decay coverage), no where-refinement. Q6 dominance ordering + Q7 SymbolicCost preserves full expression both ratified; new anti-pattern #11 forbidding parallel InverseCost/ReciprocalCost variants. Canvas (PR #2828) updates: - §1 PROMOTE: PolynomialCost.degree = signed Rational (no refinement); subsumes negative degrees for asymptotic-decay - §4 Q2-Y candidate: drop "where degree > 0"; plain Rational - §6 refinement-carriers: PositiveRational DROPPED (struck-through with Director cite); ExponentialBase + PolyLogExponent unchanged - NEW §6.1 Q6 asymptotic-dominance ordering verbatim Director conjecture (reverse-sign-convention via Field.compare; Q1-α authority) - NEW §6.2 Q7 SymbolicCost preserves full expression; Big-O is derived operation (dominant_term / asymptotic_class) - §10 anti-pattern #11: no parallel InverseCost/ReciprocalCost when carrier-extension dissolves question - §12 ratifications Q6 + Q7 added; Practice 4 GREEN per Director pre-emption Worker brief updates: - §1 PROMOTE: signed Rational, no refinement - §5.0 PositiveRational refinement DROPPED with struck-through comment - §5.1 PolynomialCost.degree: Rational (Q6 signed) - NEW §6.0 Q7 canonical-form preservation: SymbolicCost preserves all terms; canonicalize ≠ dominant_term; mixed-sign canonicalization test - NEW §6.1 Q6 dominance rule encoded via Field.compare reverse-sign - §6.2 same-variable algebra fold rules header - §11 anti-pattern #11 mirrored - §16 Director msg_2c1bfb0e reference added Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — purge stale PositiveRational refs (cursor 10886) Cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS review 10886: post-Q6 scope-extension (243fd63), several PositiveRational / degree≤0 refinement references remained in canvas STOP-SIGNAL prose + worker brief verbatim STOP block, "zero new authority" line, hard-stop directive, STOP condition #4, anti-pattern #7, and §13 verification axis listing. Worker could follow the verbatim STOP/anti-pattern text and encode wrong carrier shape relative to ratified Q6/Q2-Y signed-Rational. Fix-forward: - Canvas §6 STOP-SIGNAL prose: PolynomialCost { degree: PositiveRational } → { degree: Rational } (signed per Q6) - Canvas §10 anti-pattern #7: drop degree≤0/PositiveRational requirement on PolynomialCost; explicit exclusion citing Q6 - Worker §4 verbatim STOP block: same PolynomialCost.degree text fix - Worker §5.0 "ZERO new authority": drop PositiveRational from refinement list; note PolynomialCost.degree plain signed - Worker §5.0 hard-stop directive: drop PositiveRational; add Q6 carve-out note - Worker §10 STOP #4 variant collision: drop PositiveRational from de-dup list; add anti-pattern-#7-fires note - Worker §11 anti-pattern #7: degree≤0 dropped; explicit PolynomialCost.degree exclusion per Q6 - Worker §13 verification axis: PositiveRational removed from refinement-carriers test list INVARIANTS P1/P2 single-authority restored across both briefs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — STOP-SIGNAL line range :60-72 → :69-72 Cursor REQUEST_CHANGES 10904: brief cited STOP-SIGNAL as :60-72 across 7 surfaces but the live file has STOP at :69-72 and Pattern 3/4 dissolution receipt at :49-67. A literal Phase B "replace :60-72" would delete part of the dissolution receipt — INVARIANTS P1 (dispatch prose must ground in identifiable file facts) + P2 (single edit locus). Fix-forward: - Canvas L10 / L46 / L325 STOP-cite: :60-72 → :69-72 - Worker L42 / L90 (Phase B replace) / L261 / L350 / L373: :60-72 → :69-72 - Worker §4 Phase B: explicit DO-NOT-TOUCH callout on :49-67 dissolution receipt; replacement is surgical 4-line STOP block only Brief is now internally consistent with canvas:204 ("Current src/v3/std/algebra.dag:69-72") which was already correct. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 worker — drop stale gt_zero extension from Phase A list Cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS 10920: §5.0 KNOWN_PREDICATES extension list still required extending gt_zero's allowed_carriers to Rational, but PositiveRational was dropped in the Q6 scope-extension (243fd63) — no in-scope refinement uses gt_zero on Rational anymore. Conflicting dispatch vs the comment block above. Fix-forward: Phase A list now has only the gt_one addition (genuinely required for PolyLogExponent = Rational where gt_one). Explicit parenthetical: gt_zero extension NOT required; range allowed_carriers already includes Int for ExponentialBase. Only gt_one is new. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — Q6 zero-degree collision + Q7 worker semantics + AP count Codex BLOCKING review 4bd0cb5 — 2 BLOCKING + 1 non-blocking: 1. Q6 carrier admits degree=0 colliding with ConstantCost (n^0 ≡ 1): Fix-forward: keep ratified plain signed Rational carrier; add explicit canonicalize-fold rule canvas §6.1 + worker §6 algebra: `canonicalize(PolyCost(_, 0)) ⇒ ConstantCost(1)`. Same dissolution discipline class as Q2-Y LinearCost ≡ PolyCost(d=1) collapse. Single authority for "value=1 constant" via ConstantCost, not parallel via PolyCost(_, 0). 2. Q7 output-semantics drift between canvas + worker §14: Fix-forward: worker §14 reframed — symbolic_cost_of returns EXACT canonical SymbolicCost (Q7 contract change, not backwards-compatible reduction). Big-O is derived via dominant_term projection. Legacy single-term consumers MUST wrap with dominant_term; canonical-form change is expected and ratified. 3. Anti-pattern off-by-one (non-blocking): worker §11 enumerated 11 items but header + §12 + §13 + §15 PR template said 10. Fix-forward: updated all 4 cite-list surfaces to 11 (7 Director-enumerated + 4 Mgr-derived). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — Q6 Option B Practice-2 carrier refinement (msg_b80bcaa8) Director RATIFIED Option B on Q6 zero-degree Practice-2 tension via msg_b80bcaa8 (relayed by PM msg_9d248cbd 2026-05-13). Practice-2 carrier-level `where nonzero` refinement preferred over Practice-4 canonicalize-fold dissolution; sign-admission intent preserved. Director-distilled discipline rule (NEW, load-bearing): > Same-variant redundancy → Practice-4 collapse (Q2-Y LinearCost ≡ > PolyCost(d=1)). Cross-variant redundancy → Practice-2 carrier > refinement (PolyCost(d=0) ≡ ConstantCost(1)). Type-level state-space > tightening beats API-level normalization when redundant state crosses > variant boundaries. Canvas + worker fix-forward: - §1 PROMOTE / §3 Q2-Y candidate / §6 STOP-SIGNAL / §6.1 dissolution text: `Rational` → `Rational where nonzero` (sign-admission via msg_2c1bfb0e preserved; only degree=0 excluded) - Canvas §6.1: reframed from canonicalize-fold to carrier-level refinement; Practice-2 vs Practice-4 disambiguation rule encoded - Worker §5 Phase A KNOWN_PREDICATES list: add `nonzero` predicate (allowed_carriers: Rational; arg_shape: Bare); now 2 new predicates (gt_one + nonzero), not 1 - Worker §5 "ZERO new authority" line: cite cross-variant vs same-variant rule - Worker §6 algebra table: canonicalize-fold rule REMOVED (type prevents construction); multiplicative cancellation rule split into d1+d2≠0 and d1+d2=0 cases (=0 maps to ConstantCost(1) directly without PolyCost(d=0) intermediate which is type-rejected) - Worker §7 bootstrap ratchet: type-rejection negative test added (PolyCost(_, Rational(0)) must be structurally rejected; ±n admits) - §11 anti-pattern #12 (new, Director-added): forbid canonicalize-fold for cross-variant redundancy when carrier refinement available - AP cite-list counts: 11 → 12 across §11 header / §12 / §13 / §15 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 canvas — reconcile Q2-Y refinement + variant arithmetic Cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS 10980 — 2 internal-consistency findings: 1. Q2-Y parenthetical "no where refinement" contradicted the snippet directly above showing `where nonzero` (post msg_b80bcaa8 Option B). Reconciled: explicit "no positivity / gt_zero refinement" framing per Director msg_2c1bfb0e sign-admission intent, AND explicit acknowledgment that `where nonzero` IS present per msg_b80bcaa8 Practice-2 carrier-level Option B (sign-orthogonal, excludes only 0). 2. Q2-Y Pros bullet "11 → 10 net" contradicted §4 closing "**9** net under Q2-Y". Reconciled: corrected to "7 → 9 net" matching §1 ratified scope (+3 new variants -1 collapsed = +3 net over existing 7) and §4 closing reconciliation pointer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 — codex 77088ff non-blocking wording hygiene Codex no-blocking + 2 non-blocking improvements (77088ff review): - worker L156: "no such refinement" → "no positivity refinement, but DOES carry where nonzero" (clarifies sign-admission vs zero-exclusion distinction for downstream readers). - canvas L285: §10 anti-pattern header "7 Director + 3 Mgr-derived" → "7 Director + 5 Mgr-derived; 12 total" (matches actual 12-item list per worker §11 cite-list). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(r3): gate #105 — named NonZeroRational alias (codex worker:167) Codex BLOCKING worker:167: inline `Rational where nonzero` in struct field types is unsupported by HEAD parser/lowerer — `where` refinements attach only to type aliases / parameters (precedent `type PositiveInt = Nat where gt_zero` at dsl/std/integer.dag:181). Inline use would require unsupported substrate syntax instead of making illegal degree=0 unrepresentable through a proper named refinement carrier. Fix-forward: introduce `type NonZeroRational = Rational where nonzero` at the type-alias layer (alongside existing `PolyLogExponent = Rational where gt_one` + `ExponentialBase = Int where range(min: 2)`). PolynomialCost.degree field type references the named alias: `degree: NonZeroRational`. Updates across both briefs: - All `degree: Rational where nonzero` → `degree: NonZeroRational` (5 canvas occurrences + 10 worker occurrences) - Worker §5.0 dag block: NonZeroRational alias declaration added with rationale comment citing codex worker:167 + HEAD parser constraint - Canvas §6 refinement-carriers list: NonZeroRational row added with named-alias note - Worker §5.0 HARD STOP directive: NonZeroRational added to the hard-stop list (named alias, not fresh record); HEAD parser constraint cited - Worker §10 STOP #4 variant-collision list: NonZeroRational added - Worker §5.0 P1/P2 narrative: clarified "DOES carry NonZeroRational named-alias" framing - Worker §7 bootstrap ratchet test: type-rejection test asserts both the type-alias declaration AND the degree=0 rejection at carrier level - Worker §13 verification axis: NonZeroRational added to refinement- carriers test list INVARIANTS P2 + Practice 2 carrier-level illegal-states-unrepresentable satisfied via named alias (P5 / parser-supported substrate syntax). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): gate #105 canvas — fix §6 'no refinement' stale text (codex canvas:218) Canvas §6 closing paragraph still said "PolynomialCost.degree intentionally has no refinement" — pre-msg_b80bcaa8 framing that contradicts the NonZeroRational alias declared 3 lines above + ratified by msg_b80bcaa8. Fix-forward: reframe as "no positivity refinement, but DOES carry NonZeroRational named alias for zero-exclusion". Sign-admission preserved (msg_2c1bfb0e); zero-exclusion enforced (msg_b80bcaa8). Also added explicit reference to degree=0 alongside exponent≤1 / base≤1 in the structurally-unrepresentable set. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * WIP: R3 Substrate Mgr — lane through R3 close * docs(r3): gate #105 canvas — STOP-SIGNAL Tier-2 cite msg_ad5e934d → msg_d86a5987 (cursor 11087) Cursor APPROVE_WITH_COMMENTS 11087: canvas §6 STOP-SIGNAL cited msg_ad5e934d for Tier-2 R4-deferral, but the worker brief §4 verbatim STOP block cited msg_d86a5987 for the same sentence. msg_ad5e934d was the original Path A Tier-1 ratification; the §8 Tier-2-deferral disposition was ratified in msg_d86a5987 (per composite-ratification text already used elsewhere in worker §0/§2/§9/§13/§15). Canvas STOP-SIGNAL aligned to msg_d86a5987 for single-authority trace. INVARIANTS P2 single authoritative trace restored. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ING (#3133) * docs(r3): §1.8 row #103 ci_uses_affected_set_selection → CONSUMER_LANDED + PASSING Layer 1 substrate (PR #2798) + Layer 2 BinaryShim consumer / path-regex removal (PR #3033) are both merged. Three integration tests in `src/v3/compiler/tests/integration/t_ci_workflow_as_data_demo_test.rs` pin the gate predicate: - `ci_uses_affected_set_selection_binary_shim_narrow_on_gunbc_ci_topology` (Layer 1 narrow-on-direct-touch) - `ci_uses_affected_set_selection_binary_shim_unknown_receipt_full_roster` (full-roster fallback when narrowing is unavailable) - `workflow_no_path_regex_policy_ci_yml` (Layer 2 canvas §5 path-regex removal invariant over tracked `.github/workflows/*.{yml,yaml}`, single authority `scripts/workflow-path-regex-forbidden-substrings.txt`) All three green at HEAD via `cargo test -p v3-compiler --test integration`. `.github/workflows/ci.yml` carries no `paths:` / `paths-ignore:` / `dorny/paths-filter` / `changes:` gating. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(r3): fix §1.8 row #103 stale line anchors (1017,1034/1066 → 1058,1075/1107) Per cursor/composer-2 review on PR #3133: row #103's receipt cites had stale line numbers after main-merge shifts. Update to match HEAD of src/v3/compiler/tests/integration/t_ci_workflow_as_data_demo_test.rs. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
SG-0 hand-path delta: +1
SG-0 pairing: (c) dispatch tracked via docs/briefs/r3-wave1-s6-slice7-affected-set-impl-worker.md for remainder of gate #103 (BinaryShim + lens integration); this PR adds one EXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_NON_TEST row only.
Auto-opened by session-dashboard for session
swift-wren-365.Pushing to
session/swift-wren-365advances this PR.Summary
Adds
v3_compiler::gunbc_ci: pure affected gate selection over a structuralCIWorkflowDagmirror (CiWorkflowDagInput+ prerequisite edges) and a gate-id diff (CiWorkflowDiff). Selection expands the touched seed by symmetricCIGateEdgeclosure (undirected adjacency to fixpoint) so downstream obligations pull in sibling prerequisites, then topologically sorts the induced directed subgraph. Fail-closed superset applies when any touched id is unknown (perdocs/design-t-wad-slice-7-binary-shim-affected-set-selection-canvas.md§3).Authority:
docs/briefs/r3-wave1-s6-slice7-affected-set-impl-worker.mdPhase B; substrate carrierdsl/gunbc/ci.dag(CIWorkflowDag/CIGateEdge). Git, path-regex, and PR #2713 lens mapping stay outside this module (single-authority at this boundary).Phase C scaffolding:
selection_subset_under_touch_set_growthdocuments the monotone set-inclusion witness used by ratchet tests.P5(b) per-PR receipt (INVARIANTS Dispatch-Discipline Mechanisms (b))
Single checkable receipt: SG-0 home-of-record —
src/v3/compiler/src/gunbc_ci.rsadded toEXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_NON_TESTinsrc/v3/compiler/tests/integration/sg0_census_test.rswith matching dissolution row inINVARIANTS.mdunder SG-0 hand-authored compiler non-test paths (ROADMAP.md§ Forward-Tracked Lane: T-Workflow-As-Data, ≈L57–L63; program gate #103ci_uses_affected_set_selectionperdocs/r3-program-plan.md+ the Slice-7 worker brief).Test plan
cargo test -p v3-compiler gunbc_ci— pass (7 unit tests).cargo test -p v3-compiler sg0_expected_list_is_sorted_and_unique sg0_v3_non_test_hand_authored_subratchet— pass (SG-0 census invariants after the newEXPECTED_HAND_AUTHORED_NON_TESTline).CTRL_BUILD_BYPASS_SHIMS=1 cargo clippy -p v3-compiler --all-targets -- -D warnings— pass.Worker attestation