Repository navigation
Conversation
…SIGN links Operator ruling, 2026-10-07: the plans corpus is anchoring sessions on stale state (a 2026-07-22 receipt was read as the current fleet-subsumption standing while mtcollins1 had since booted diskless through the BMC). Bankrupted rather than maintained, as docs/probes was in #9132. History keeps it; a plan is restored when a lane needs it. WHAT IS DELETED: the 111 hand-written plan documents and the receipts/ and edge-label-coproduct/ subtrees, plus the 96 HandAuthoredDocBind rows in gunbc.doc_graph_roots whose document no longer exists (a bind naming no document is not a root). WHAT SURVIVES: - the 82 plans generated from .dag Plan carriers (deleting them means deleting their carriers and registry rows; that is a follow-up cut, not a file rm); - the six hand-written documents DESIGN.md links, so the design document keeps no dead link: replacement-migration-doctrine, scaffold-admission-doctrine, fabric-storage, serving-capacity-home-ruling, map-literal-introduction-design, ci-end-to-end-accounting. Prose citations of deleted paths inside .dag String rows and comments are left as historical text: they are not read as files by any producer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 80c2a87d1b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| @@ -1,300 +0,0 @@ | |||
| # CONVERGENCE-ONE — program record at wind-down | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Deleting this document leaves the active roadmap entries in ROADMAP.md:153-154 linking to a nonexistent authority. The same batch also removes six other documents still linked from ROADMAP.md and the T5B decision still linked from docs/plans/self-host-cargo-refusal-root-partition.md. These are parsed Markdown links, not the intentionally retained .dag prose citations: build_doc_graph_report records missing .md targets as dangling, so doc_graph_has_no_dangling_links at dag/test/claim/doc_reachability_witness_test.dag:209-210 will refuse until the links are removed, retargeted, or their documents retained.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
…n D15; delete the separate doc Per operator direction (and the 2026-10-07 plans bankruptcy, #13550): no hand-written plan document. D15 in gunbc.plans.demand_engine_program gains the design constraints the analysis established and the deferred full-program target with its home authorities. The dated memo-on/memo-off comparison is the receipt on this PR's description. The native-memory-parse note records the current state. Projections regenerated with generated_artifact_gate main_wet. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 participant
Operator ruling, 2026-10-07: the plans corpus is anchoring sessions on stale
state (a 2026-07-22 receipt was read as the current fleet-subsumption standing
while mtcollins1 had since booted diskless through the BMC). Bankrupted rather
than maintained, as docs/probes was in #9132. History keeps it; a plan is
restored when a lane needs it.
WHAT IS DELETED: the 111 hand-written plan documents and the receipts/ and
edge-label-coproduct/ subtrees, plus the 96 HandAuthoredDocBind rows in
gunbc.doc_graph_roots whose document no longer exists (a bind naming no
document is not a root).
WHAT SURVIVES:
their carriers and registry rows; that is a follow-up cut, not a file rm);
no dead link: replacement-migration-doctrine, scaffold-admission-doctrine,
fabric-storage, serving-capacity-home-ruling, map-literal-introduction-design,
ci-end-to-end-accounting.
Prose citations of deleted paths inside .dag String rows and comments are left
as historical text: they are not read as files by any producer.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code