Skip to content

Revert #13038: main red on 62 lambda/fold claims - #13293

Merged
gunbai-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
revert-13038
Oct 4, 2026
Merged

gunbai-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
revert-13038

Conversation

@gunbai-bot

@gunbai-bot gunbai-bot Bot commented Oct 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reverts #13038 (a21a901), merged into main.

Why: main at 44ed81c fails about 62 function-value, lambda and fold claims that pass at 072c37b. royal-deer-478's probe runs are 37210398646 (red) and 37204680949 (green). In the window, wise-ant-549 cleared #13244 and #13166 (all four probe claims pass at 47f457f), so the only remaining v2 compiler change is #13038. These claims are planned only when a diff reaches them, so the merge queue stayed green while any PR touching them, including #13043, goes red.

Status: reverted under sharp-raven-357's advance approval, and held until the per-commit bisect (a21a901 vs 9db1a8b) confirms it; that is running now. #13038 re-lands with the fix plus a control on this route (an unannotated fn literal and a fold step through the kinded binder path).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

gunbc-ci-auto-heal and others added 2 commits October 4, 2026 15:58
Main at 44ed81c fails about 62 function-value/lambda/fold claims that
pass at 072c37b (royal-deer-478's probe run 37210398646 vs 37204680949).
The window's only v2 compiler change is #13038 (a21a901); #13244 and
#13166 are cleared at 47f457f. Reverted under sharp-raven-357's
pre-approval; #13038 re-lands with the fix and a control for this route.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The clean revert took back #13038's repair of a latent main red: those
fixtures passed a ResolvedTree record where a Node is declared, and strict
preparation refused the floor on it (royal-deer-478, run 37215059669). They
pass fixture_add_resolved_tree().root and do not depend on kinded type params.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@gunbai-bot
gunbai-bot Bot added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 4, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit f10cf27 Oct 4, 2026
4 checks passed
@gunbai-bot
gunbai-bot Bot deleted the revert-13038 branch October 4, 2026 19:37
gunbai-bot Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2026
… the declared-order mint returns with #13038

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
gunbai-bot Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2026
…r the srv1 regen)

Conflict calls:
- docs/design-rung-drops.md: main's copy. rung_drop/roster.dag stays deleted (every main row is a
  stem-declaring drop file).
- non_fold_residue: three-way row set. floor_unimported_bare_provider_debt_roster: keyed three-way;
  the 21 fabric_witness_run_test keys main retired as ResolvesInClosure keep main's cause (the floor
  refuses a changed retirement); keys main left ActiveDebt keep the branch's ImportsFixed.
- src/v2/std/node.dag: main reverted #13038 (#13293); main's reverted predicates on the branch's
  enumerated arms.
- fleet_converge_plan: main's fleet_plan_component_hash (already exhaustive).
- swift/rows.dag: main's (it enumerated the same arms; taking both would duplicate them).
- src/v1/stage0/src/v1_compiler_infer.rs (generated mirror): clean three-way text merge of the srv1
  regen side and main's side, to be confirmed by the generated lane's regen fixed point.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
gunbai-bot Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 5, 2026
… 37268087131

Main retired them as ClaimDeleted when #13293 reverted #13038; the re-land brings
the claims back, and floor run 37268087131 at 27e140c refused exactly these nine
at enrolment, each the one claim demanding its own assembly specimen (410642-422505
eval steps against 72300). Set ActiveFillDebt from that measurement; no warm rows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants