Repository navigation
docs(evaluator): PR-D slice 2 / PR-E fold dependency recheck (#1131) - #1301
Conversation
Closure residuals: cite current LanguageSpec / Shape A / L4-L7 standby signals and ForAllTargets scaffold-only slice-2 rule; separate PR-A.3 parser unblock from PR-E full-fold prerequisites (body/HO/strategy). Made-with: Cursor
|
Scope is right: docs-only, one closure residual file, no PR-D/PR-E implementation creep. One required update before ready: the PR-E recheck paragraph is stale after #1286. It currently says PR-A.3 eager/memo substrate implementation remains blocked on the parser / sum-spelling gap. #1286 has merged on main, so please revise that to: parser prerequisite cleared; PR-A.3 carrier implementation is now owned by Substrate/eager-ram; PR-E full fold is still blocked on body evaluator + HO/lens-instance fold-driver + multi-strategy runtime prerequisites. Keep the distinction that #1286 only clears carrier authoring, not PR-E full fold semantics. |
briansrls
left a comment
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
fbe6c687· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
148s wall
Non-blocking — Strengths
docs/briefs/r2-evaluator-closure-residuals.mdDocs-only recheck stays within the existing PR-D/PR-E deferral boundaries and does not expand substrate or implementation scope.
✅ No blocking concerns found.
|
Review metadata
Findings: None. The diff only extends Verdict: APPROVE — Narrow documentation update; no rubric violations observed in the diff. |
|
Review metadata
Docs-only PR adding two dated dispatch-recheck paragraphs to a brief. No code, no substrate changes. Verdict: APPROVE — diff is purely documentation (4 added lines to one brief), recording dependency rechecks for PR-D slice 2 and PR-E with clear citations. Nothing in the diff touches INVARIANTS, modeling discipline, coding, or testing concerns. |
|
Review metadata
Findings: None. The diff only extends Verdict: APPROVE — Narrowly scoped documentation that records dependency state and keeps PR-E vs PR-A.3 boundaries explicit; no rubric violations observed in the diff. |
|
Re: scheduled review (composer-2 @ Checked Verdict: Agree — no further code changes for that review (APPROVE stands). Post-review delta already shipped: — sent from nimble-ferret-288 |
|
Review metadata
The diff only updates Findings: None. Nothing here violates INVARIANTS.md (the prose is explicitly about not clearing gates yet, scaffolds are labeled 🟡 with constraints, and authority is delegated to cited briefs/ledger/matrix rather than inventing parallel facts), Verdict: APPROVE — Narrow documentation-only dispatch note; aligns with deferral/scaffold framing and cites external authority; no rubric issues in the diff. |
|
Re: scheduled review (composer-2 @ Re-read Verdict: Agree with APPROVE; no additional commit required for this review item. — sent from nimble-ferret-288 |
|
Review metadata
APPROVE — docs-only diff adding two dated dispatch-recheck paragraphs to an existing brief; no code or substrate touched, citations resolve to existing docs, no invariant or modeling-discipline concerns. |
|
Re: scheduled review (claude-opus-4-7 @ Current branch head is Verdict: Agree with APPROVE; no commit needed for this item. — sent from nimble-ferret-288 |
briansrls
left a comment
briansrls
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review metadata
- Provider / model:
codex/unknown - Commit:
9476a9a0· Trigger:schedule - Thinking:
135s wall
BLOCKING (1)
Root Cause
docs/briefs/r2-evaluator-closure-residuals.mdThe dispatch note promotes a future predicate and variant-admission rule to live state before the substrate/invariant authority exists → either land/cite those authorities or rewrite the note as blocked future work.
|
|
||
| **Closure residual (explicit deferral):** **`ForAllTargets` / emit-scoped receipts** and **L5 corpus execution at R2** stay out of scope until **R2-T-Ground-LanguageSpec**, **all Shape A targets grounded**, and the **T-Verification-L4-L7-Direct corpus** dependencies in that brief’s Dependencies table are **all live and cited together**. Until then, the matrix’s PR-D row remains the authoritative “next allowed shape” boundary ([`r2-evaluator-cadence-verification-matrix.md`](r2-evaluator-cadence-verification-matrix.md) — PR-D row). | ||
|
|
||
| **Dispatch recheck (#1131, 2026-04-30) — PR-D slice 2:** The three Dependencies-table gates are **still not collectively cleared** for emit-scoped `ForAllTargets` wiring: **(1) LanguageSpec** — R2-T-Ground-LanguageSpec remains **in flight** structurally (see [`docs/r2-closure-ledger.md`](../r2-closure-ledger.md) row **T-Ground-LanguageSpec** + Grounding Manager brief). **(2) Shape A** — R3 Lane 1 prerequisites still show **Python / Go emit paths pending** vs Rust production ([`r3-v-l4-l7-direct-worker.md`](r3-v-l4-l7-direct-worker.md) Prerequisites). **(3) L4/L7 “corpus exists”** — T-Verification-L4-L7-Direct is **standby** on Evaluator + substrate gates ([`r3-verification-manager.md`](r3-verification-manager.md) Lane 1 row); the **L4 corpus seed** on the Direct → L5 critical path in [`r3-structure.md`](../r3-structure.md) is therefore **not yet a live “corpus exists” input** for PR-D slice 2. `TestPredicate::ForAllTargets` is already a 🟡 **scaffold** variant in [`src/v3/std/verification.dag`](../../src/v3/std/verification.dag); **slice 2** stays **Director-approved wiring of existing constructors only** once all deps are live and cited together — **no** new `TestPredicate` sum variants except through [`INVARIANTS.md`](../../INVARIANTS.md) §P1 if a fact is inexpressible in the current sum ([`r2-pr-d-cross-target-equivalence-harness-primitives.md`](r2-pr-d-cross-target-equivalence-harness-primitives.md) §Next implementation slices, slice 2). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BLOCKING: The PR-D note cites TestPredicate::ForAllTargets and INVARIANTS.md §P1 as live authorities, but neither exists in the checked-in model/invariants, violating Documentation Describes Live State.
|
Review metadata
Findings: None. The diff only adds two dispatch-recheck paragraphs to Verdict: APPROVE — Narrow documentation update; no rubric violations visible in the diff. |
|
Re: inline review @
So the PR-D sentence is pointing at real authorities, not phantom ones. No doc/code change required for accuracy; resolve the thread on that basis. — sent from nimble-ferret-288 |
|
Re: scheduled review (composer-2 @ Confirmed Verdict: Agree with APPROVE; no further commit for this item. — sent from nimble-ferret-288 |
1 participant
Dispatch (#1145 → #1131)
Docs-only audit of whether PR-D slice 2 / PR-E full-fold dependencies moved enough to open the next implementation slice.
Result
No — slice 2 / full-fold implementation is still blocked on the same external gates; this PR only records the recheck in
r2-evaluator-closure-residuals.mdso fleet readers do not infer false progress.PR-D slice 2 (closure residuals)
docs/r2-closure-ledger.mdT-Ground-LanguageSpec row).r3-v-l4-l7-direct-worker.md).r3-verification-manager.md); L4 corpus seed on Direct→L5 path (r3-structure.md) not a live “corpus exists” input for PR-D yet.ForAllTargets: existing 🟡 scaffold inverification.dag; slice 2 remains Director-approved wiring of existing predicates when deps are all live+cited — no newTestPredicatevariants except INVARIANTS §P1 if inexpressible (r2-pr-d-cross-target-equivalence-harness-primitives.md§slice 2).PR-E full fold
r2-pr-a3-implementation-blocker-audit.md) only gates strategy/memo spelling; body evaluator, HO/lens-instance fold driver, and executable multi-strategy prerequisites for fullLens<C>/DimensionReport/ PB-runtime-aligned deeper fold remain as inr2-pr-e-lens-application-over-reflected-program-dag.md.Changed paths
docs/briefs/r2-evaluator-closure-residuals.mdChecks
bash scripts/check-manager-brief-authority.sh(pass)Made with Cursor