Skip to content

Record #10933 x #10934 as the next stale-green instance in gunbc.plans.ci_merge_freshness - #10984

Merged
briansrls merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
session/warm-ram-494-stale-green-10933x10934
Sep 11, 2026
Merged

briansrls merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
session/warm-ram-494-stale-green-10933x10934

Conversation

@gunbai-bot

@gunbai-bot gunbai-bot Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR records the #10933 × #10934 incident as the next instance in the existing stale-green authority, gunbc.plans.ci_merge_freshness, as §7. It adds no new failure-mode row and no mechanism, and it is separate from #10978.

Same class as §1 (#5429). #10934's green witnesses run 34520652774 started at 19:28:58Z against a base without #10933. #10933 merged at 20:07:51Z while that run was in flight. #10934 then merged at 21:23:51Z on the same head, never re-run. The one difference from §1 is what crossed: there a gate crossed a module, here a new consumer crossed a deletion. §2's "overlapping, never-jointly-validated PRs" covers both.

Facts are kept at their grain:

  • Observed on main at a4b21cb8e47 (run 34531957010, declarations phase): exactly 2 IMPORT-MEMBER-ABSENT findings from this pair. The same run carries a third, from an unrelated crossing (grain_admits_single_cabinet, repaired by Follow the rename #10865 made: grain_admits_single_cabinet is now grain_offers_single_cabinet #10968). §7 names it and excludes it from the count.
  • Established independently from source, not emitted by any run: the witness also constructed ReadbackConfirmed with observed_digest, so restoring the imports alone would not have repaired the tree.
  • Contributing factor, stated plainly: one manager held both lanes, flagged only the textual conflict risk, and never compiled the merged pair.

The instance sits under the record's existing retirement condition, the §3 merge-time freshness requirement.

Verification: this is a prose-only edit to an existing PlanIsAuthorityOnly carrier, with no committed projection. I did not compile it locally, so CI is the compile check. I checked every timestamp, SHA and finding against gh and the run log.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01S44GATAuUiFerAsjYZFmaa

Brian Searls and others added 3 commits September 10, 2026 23:51
…s.ci_merge_freshness

A deletion (#10934) crossed a new consumer (#10933) in never-jointly-validated
PRs: #10934's green run started before #10933 merged and #10934 merged on that
head without re-running. main went red with 2 IMPORT-MEMBER-ABSENT findings from
this pair until #10977. Records the timeline, the independently established
ReadbackConfirmed construction the run never reached, and the contributing
factor (one manager held both lanes and never compiled the merged pair). No new
mechanism: the instance sits under the record's existing retirement condition.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S44GATAuUiFerAsjYZFmaa
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S44GATAuUiFerAsjYZFmaa
…d what landed inside it

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01S44GATAuUiFerAsjYZFmaa
@briansrls
briansrls merged commit 5389c8b into main Sep 11, 2026
6 of 8 checks passed
@briansrls
briansrls deleted the session/warm-ram-494-stale-green-10933x10934 branch September 11, 2026 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant