Skip to content

Implement new Codec that uses mem.BufferSlice instead of []byte #11552

Implement new Codec that uses mem.BufferSlice instead of []byte

Implement new Codec that uses mem.BufferSlice instead of []byte #11552

Re-run triggered August 21, 2024 21:03
Status Success
Total duration 6m 33s
Artifacts

testing.yml

on: pull_request
vet-proto
25s
vet-proto
Matrix: tests
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

10 errors
tests (vet, 1.22): xds/internal/httpfilter/router/router.go#L57
redefinition of the built-in type any https://revive.run/r#redefines-builtin-id
tests (vet, 1.22): internal/status/status.go#L141
redefinition of the built-in type any https://revive.run/r#redefines-builtin-id
tests (vet, 1.22): mem/buffers.go#L68
exported function IsBelowBufferPoolingThreshold should have comment or be unexported https://revive.run/r#exported
tests (vet, 1.22): mem/buffers.go#L203
exported function ReadUnsafe should have comment or be unexported https://revive.run/r#exported
tests (vet, 1.22): mem/buffers.go#L235
exported type SliceBuffer should have comment or be unexported https://revive.run/r#exported
tests (vet, 1.22): mem/buffers.go#L237
exported method SliceBuffer.ReadOnlyData should have comment or be unexported https://revive.run/r#exported
tests (vet, 1.22): mem/buffers.go#L238
exported method SliceBuffer.Ref should have comment or be unexported https://revive.run/r#exported
tests (vet, 1.22): mem/buffers.go#L239
exported method SliceBuffer.Free should have comment or be unexported https://revive.run/r#exported
tests (vet, 1.22): mem/buffers.go#L240
exported method SliceBuffer.Len should have comment or be unexported https://revive.run/r#exported
tests (vet, 1.22): interop/observability/client/client.go#L19
should have a package comment https://revive.run/r#package-comments