Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 29, 2021. It is now read-only.

Add support for parallel scans #42

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2018

Conversation

jjnicola
Copy link
Member

@jjnicola jjnicola commented Sep 3, 2018

Add 'parallel' attribut to <start_scan> command to specify the maximal
number of simultaneous scans to be run.
Update documentation.
Add unit tests.

@jjnicola jjnicola requested a review from a team September 3, 2018 11:01
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #42 into master will decrease coverage by 1.25%.
The diff coverage is 27.02%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #42      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.68%   63.43%   -1.26%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines        1229     1176      -53     
==========================================
- Hits          795      746      -49     
+ Misses        434      430       -4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
ospd/ospd.py 66.61% <27.02%> (+0.56%) ⬆️
ospd/misc.py 61.08% <0%> (-4.32%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c80324c...b9eebea. Read the comment docs.

@jjnicola jjnicola force-pushed the parallel-scan branch 2 times, most recently from 8b3240d to d9abcb3 Compare September 3, 2018 12:02
@jjnicola jjnicola requested a review from kroosec September 3, 2018 12:36
Add 'parallel' attribut to <start_scan> command to specify the maximal
number of simultaneous scans to be run.
Update documentation.
Add unit tests.
@janowagner janowagner merged commit 1e84ada into greenbone:master Sep 20, 2018
@jjnicola jjnicola deleted the parallel-scan branch September 26, 2018 14:30
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants