-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 829
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Render railway:track_ref
value as railway label when name
is absent
#3962
Comments
Thank you for opening this issue, @Lispach, and welcome! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway:track_ref Also mentioned briefly in table at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging It appears that this key is used heavily in a few countries, but not globally: most usage is in central Europe, especially France, Germany, Poland, Finland, and a few neighboring countries. It's used in Japan and South Korea, but only rarely, and in the USA and Australia there is only usage in a couple of places. There are no uses in Africa, Southeast Asia, South Asia, Central Asia, Central America, and only a handful in Canada, South America and East Asia: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/NDk - France, 28k (I'm surprised the USA showed up on the list, because the map shows the tag is only widely used in California and a couple other places) The next highest, Russia, has 2.3k uses. It would be good to see it used in more places before we started rendering this feature. This style tries to represent the global diversity of OpenStreetMap, so tags that are used in many different places are more likely to be rendered than those that are limited to a few countries. I think it would be good to discuss this tag further, perhaps on the public transit mailing list, or the general Tagging list. Ask what are people in other countries, like the UK, Italy, India, China, Argentina etc using for this instead: |
This would increase cluttering in train station area since name tag of Please note also that name of railway track is already rendered which may increase confusion. Nevertheless, a discussion about the priority between platform and rail label rendering would be a good starting point. Note also that platform are better spaced than rail and this increase their readability. |
@Lispach did you have a chance to discuss this further? "I think it would be good to discuss this tag further, perhaps on the public transit mailing list, or the general Tagging list. Ask what are people in other countries, like the UK, Italy, India, China, Argentina etc using for this instead: name=* or ref=* or something else?" |
@jeisenbe I did not; my planning, and my brain, are currently a bit overstuffed, so I would have trouble to correctly start and follow the discussion, for now. I'll try later, when I'll have more free time and brain to do more than quick contributions. |
Good morning! I think, I can answer this question right now. Tag So I agree that it's a good idea to render trackref for tracks, because it's more correct tag for this stuff. |
Even though I like this propose, I think solving #3271 would have preference first, because there would be maybe more use for the genereal public. |
Hello, there.
Currently, only the value of
name
is rendered for railway labels. However, in most railway stations, what is used as the name of tracks is, in fact, their ref inside the station, which is stored inrailway:track_ref
. For instance, in France, a track in a station is designated Voie 1, which means track 1; this designation is, in fact, the reference of the track, which is to be recorded asrailway:track_ref=1
, not asname=Voie 1
.The problem with the current rendering is that it brings users to store what is used as the name, but which is in fact the track ref, as
name=Voie 1
and notrailway:track_ref=1
, which essentially encourages contributors to mistag the track ref asname=Voie 1
. That mistagging encouragement could be avoided ifrailway:track_ref
was the second choice for the label of railways, aftername
: ifname
exists, its value is used for the label; if noname
tag is present, but if arailway:track_ref
is present, then its value would be used for the label. This way, contributors would not be tempted to mistag the track ref asname
, and these refs (over 90.000 railways tagged withrailway:track_ref
, about the half without aname
tag) would be rendered, improving rendering of railway station tracks.Regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: