Skip to content

[v18] kube: handle net/http rewind body GOAWAY error#66710

Merged
jakealti merged 2 commits into
branch/v18from
jakealti/backport-66605-66672-branch/v18
May 13, 2026
Merged

[v18] kube: handle net/http rewind body GOAWAY error#66710
jakealti merged 2 commits into
branch/v18from
jakealti/backport-66605-66672-branch/v18

Conversation

@jakealti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #66605 and #66672 to branch/v18.

Both cherry-picks were clean (auto-merge only, no conflicts).

jakealti added 2 commits May 13, 2026 10:10
* kube: handle net/http rewind body GOAWAY error

* kube: fix data race in GOAWAY concurrent test

* kube: match wrapped rewind body errors too

* kube: set GetBody on buffered create requests
* kube: relax flaky goaway concurrent assertion

* kube: drop unused retried counter and log
@jakealti jakealti added kubernetes-access no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry no-test-plan Bypasses the test plan validation bot labels May 13, 2026
@jakealti jakealti marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2026 14:18
@jakealti jakealti changed the title [v18] kube: handle net/http rewind body GOAWAY error + flaky test fix [v18] kube: handle net/http rewind body GOAWAY error May 13, 2026
@jakealti jakealti enabled auto-merge May 13, 2026 14:38
@public-teleport-github-review-bot public-teleport-github-review-bot Bot removed the request for review from rosstimothy May 13, 2026 14:38
@jakealti jakealti added this pull request to the merge queue May 13, 2026
Merged via the queue into branch/v18 with commit 84f5e98 May 13, 2026
60 checks passed
@jakealti jakealti deleted the jakealti/backport-66605-66672-branch/v18 branch May 13, 2026 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport kubernetes-access no-changelog Indicates that a PR does not require a changelog entry no-test-plan Bypasses the test plan validation bot size/md

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants