-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Convert user tasks and user login state to new cache collections #54491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does
StrictObjectToStructexport a pointer to a pointer?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I shamelessly copied this from access lists. It looks like all existing variants of this resource style use the same pattern though. So if it's not correct we need to fix it everywhere.
teleport/api/types/accesslist/accesslist.go
Lines 410 to 414 in a15a952
teleport/api/types/discoveryconfig/discoveryconfig.go
Lines 181 to 185 in a15a952
teleport/api/types/externalauditstorage/externalauditstorage.go
Lines 238 to 242 in a15a952
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like we just pass it to
(json.Decoder).Decodeso we really don't need the double pointer, though it will work just fine.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we changed this to
then
((*UserLoginState)(nil)).Clone()will be equivalent to&UserLoginState{}, right now it returns(*UserLoginState)(nil).Obviously neither option is in any way sane and we should write or derive some clone function - and
awalterschulze/goderivekeeps distinguishing itself in making the entirely wrong choices once again, since it will unconditionally use unsafe and reflect to clone private fields of types which is absolutely wild - but in the meantime the wayStrictObjectToStructis being used is the least worst way.