Skip to content

[v16] [kube] support SPDY over websocket protocol for PortForward#46815

Merged
tigrato merged 1 commit intobranch/v16from
bot/backport-46663-branch/v16
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

[v16] [kube] support SPDY over websocket protocol for PortForward#46815
tigrato merged 1 commit intobranch/v16from
bot/backport-46663-branch/v16

Conversation

@tigrato
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tigrato tigrato commented Sep 20, 2024

Backport #46663 to branch/v16

changelog: Add support for Kubernetes SPDY over Websocket Protocols for PortForward.

@public-teleport-github-review-bot public-teleport-github-review-bot Bot removed the request for review from nklaassen September 20, 2024 17:25
@tigrato tigrato force-pushed the bot/backport-46663-branch/v16 branch from 4c93f7e to 5e5166d Compare September 24, 2024 16:21
SPDY has been deprecated for several years, and most proxies are expected to lose support in the coming months. To address this issue, Kubernetes introduced SPDY over WebSocket connections. This protocol leverages a WebSocket upgrade, but once established, it functions as a simple connection with SPDY-based framing.

This pull request (PR) introduces initial support for customer-facing upgrades. Future PRs will add support for teleport-to-teleport communication using the `SPDY/3.1+portforward.k8s.io` protocol.
@tigrato tigrato force-pushed the bot/backport-46663-branch/v16 branch from 5e5166d to 9f97754 Compare September 24, 2024 19:57
@tigrato tigrato enabled auto-merge September 24, 2024 20:01
@tigrato tigrato added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 24, 2024
Merged via the queue into branch/v16 with commit 68400ba Sep 24, 2024
@tigrato tigrato deleted the bot/backport-46663-branch/v16 branch September 24, 2024 20:33
@camscale camscale mentioned this pull request Sep 25, 2024
@fheinecke fheinecke mentioned this pull request Apr 9, 2025
@fheinecke fheinecke mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants