Skip to content

[v14] Remove access lists and members from the cache.#33322

Merged
mdwn merged 1 commit intobranch/v14from
mike.wilson/v14/remove-access-lists-from-cache
Oct 12, 2023
Merged

[v14] Remove access lists and members from the cache.#33322
mdwn merged 1 commit intobranch/v14from
mike.wilson/v14/remove-access-lists-from-cache

Conversation

@mdwn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mdwn mdwn commented Oct 11, 2023

Backport #33308 to branch/v14.

Note: This backport is manual due to conflicts in the unified resource cache.

The access lists and members have been removed from the cache. There's not
a lot of value having them in there and they create some uncomfortable
questions since members are dependent on access lists and the cache isn't
designed for dependent operations like this. By removing them we avoid a
lot of pain here.
@avatus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

avatus commented Oct 11, 2023

The conflicts probably have to do with my backport not getting in yet #33277. Could probably wait until that gets in and have a clean backport

@mdwn mdwn changed the title Remove access lists and members from the cache. [v14] Remove access lists and members from the cache. Oct 11, 2023
@mdwn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mdwn commented Oct 11, 2023

The conflicts probably have to do with my backport not getting in yet #33277

Just on a brief look it doesn't look like any of the stuff I ran into was there -- it was pretty minor FWIW. Just an import and the UnifiedResourceKinds var.

@avatus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

avatus commented Oct 11, 2023

Or this #32880

@mdwn mdwn added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 12, 2023
Merged via the queue into branch/v14 with commit 7f0e2bb Oct 12, 2023
@mdwn mdwn deleted the mike.wilson/v14/remove-access-lists-from-cache branch October 12, 2023 01:27
@camscale camscale mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants