pgbk: ensure TOASTed values in the change feed#29965
Merged
espadolini merged 1 commit intomasterfrom Aug 3, 2023
Merged
Conversation
Tener
reviewed
Aug 3, 2023
xacrimon
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2023
zmb3
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2023
|
@espadolini See the table below for backport results.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR makes it so that we forcibly update values during
KeepAlive, because unchanged TOASTed values are not stored in the WAL, even at logical level. This can happen when doingKeepAliveon anodewith a lot of labels, for example.This relies on the planner not being able to see that we are not going to be actually mutating the value; from my tests it seems to work even with a literal
value = value || ''but we go the extra mile and actually send an always-empty bytestring to concatenate to.A more stable solution might be to switch to
REPLICA IDENTITY FULLon the table, but that requires some smarter parsing of the change feed data and comes with some performance drawbacks (as the WAL essentially doubles in volume).Fixes #29911.