Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: [#450] The image rule of validation is wrong #532

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hwbrzzl
Copy link
Contributor

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl commented Jul 2, 2024

πŸ“‘ Description

Closes goravel/goravel#450

Related PRs: goravel/gin#67, goravel/fiber#84

βœ… Checks

  • Added test cases for my code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved data binding logic for better handling of specific field types.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated version number to v1.14.2 for consistency and clarity.
  • Tests

    • Enhanced test structure using inline assertions for clearer and more adaptable data validation.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 35.71429% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.00%. Comparing base (1b41800) to head (69c70e0).

Files Patch % Lines
validation/validator.go 35.71% 6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           v1.14.x     #532      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    70.04%   70.00%   -0.05%     
===========================================
  Files          176      176              
  Lines        10871    10884      +13     
===========================================
+ Hits          7615     7619       +4     
- Misses        2688     2694       +6     
- Partials       568      571       +3     

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 2, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes update the support package version from "v1.14.1" to "v1.14.2", improve the Bind method in the Validator struct by adding data mapping logic, and refine validator_test.go with enhanced inline assertions for clarity.

Changes

Files Change Summary
support/constant.go Updated the Version constant from "v1.14.1" to "v1.14.2".
validation/validator.go Improved Bind method logic to map data from validate.Instance to struct fields based on conditions.
validation/validator_test.go Replaced expectData struct fields with inline assert functions using assert.Equal for validation.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #) Addressed Explanation
Fix error with image and file rules (#450) ❓ The changes enhance the Bind method; unclear if it resolves the specific issue without additional context.

Poem

In code's embrace, we rise,
From 1.14.1 to 1.14.2, no disguise.
Validator grows so wise,
Mapping fields with bright eyes,
And tests now gleam, concise. πŸ‡βœ¨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b41800 and 69c70e0.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • support/constant.go (1 hunks)
  • validation/validator.go (2 hunks)
  • validation/validator_test.go (9 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • support/constant.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
validation/validator.go

[warning] 44-44: validation/validator.go#L44
Added line #L44 was not covered by tests


[warning] 51-51: validation/validator.go#L51
Added line #L51 was not covered by tests


[warning] 55-58: validation/validator.go#L55-L58
Added lines #L55 - L58 were not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (4)
validation/validator.go (1)

4-4: Import statement for mime/multipart looks good.

The import is necessary for handling file uploads.

validation/validator_test.go (3)

28-31: Test structure improvements look good.

Using inline assert functions improves clarity and flexibility.


183-190: Test for file upload looks good.

The test for file upload ensures that the multipart.FileHeader logic is covered.


37-38: Ensure test coverage for the new logic in validator.go.

Make sure the new logic for handling multipart.FileHeader types is covered by these tests.

Verification successful

Test coverage for multipart.FileHeader handling is confirmed.

The test case "success when data is post request with body" in validation/validator_test.go verifies the new logic for handling multipart.FileHeader in validator.go.

  • validation/validator_test.go: Test case "success when data is post request with body"
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new logic in `validator.go` is covered by tests.

# Test: Check for test coverage. Expect: Tests covering the new logic.
rg 'multipart.FileHeader' --context 5 --type go

Length of output: 2312



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new logic in `validator.go` is covered by tests involving `multipart.FileHeader`.

# Search for test functions in `validation/validator_test.go` that involve `multipart.FileHeader`.
rg 'multipart.FileHeader' --context 10 validation/validator_test.go

Length of output: 437



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new logic in `validator.go` is covered by tests involving `multipart.FileHeader`.

# Search for the implementation details of the `TestBind` function and its test cases.
rg 'func TestBind' --context 20 validation/validator_test.go

Length of output: 773



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new logic in `validator.go` is covered by tests involving `multipart.FileHeader`.

# Search for the complete implementation of the `TestBind` function and its test cases.
rg 'func TestBind' --context 100 validation/validator_test.go

Length of output: 2723



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new logic in `validator.go` is covered by tests involving `multipart.FileHeader`.

# Search for any test cases that involve the `File` field in `validation/validator_test.go`.
rg 'File' --context 20 validation/validator_test.go

Length of output: 2741

validation/validator.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 2, 2024

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.

@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 2, 2024

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Actions performed

Full review triggered.

@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 2, 2024

@coderabbitai summary

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Actions performed

Summary regeneration triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b41800 and 69c70e0.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • support/constant.go (1 hunks)
  • validation/validator.go (2 hunks)
  • validation/validator_test.go (9 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (19)
support/constant.go (1)

3-3: Version update is correct.

The version constant has been updated from "v1.14.1" to "v1.14.2". This change is correct and consistent with the PR objectives.

validation/validator.go (2)

4-4: Import is necessary and correct.

The mime/multipart package has been imported to handle file headers in the validation logic. This import is necessary and correct.


47-63: Test coverage for multipart.FileHeader handling is missing.

The logic for handling multipart.FileHeader types in the struct fields within validation/validator.go is not currently covered by tests. Please add test cases to ensure this logic is properly tested.

validation/validator_test.go (16)

28-31: New test case structure is correct.

The new test case structure includes name, data, rules, and assert fields, which is a good practice for organizing test cases.


37-38: Test case for lowercase key is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly when the data key is lowercase. The assertion is clear and correct.


45-46: Test case for integer key is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly when the data key is an integer. The assertion is clear and correct.


53-54: Test case for casted key is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly when the data key is casted from a string to an integer. The assertion is clear and correct.


61-63: Test case for errors is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation correctly handles errors when the data contains keys that do not match the validation rules. The assertions are clear and correct.


70-71: Test case for uppercase key is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly when the data key is uppercase. The assertion is clear and correct.


87-88: Test case for struct data with uppercase key is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly when the data is a struct with an uppercase key. The assertion is clear and correct.


103-106: Test case for struct data with lowercase key is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation correctly handles cases where the data is a struct with a lowercase key. The assertions are clear and correct.


122-125: Test case for nested struct data is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation correctly handles nested structs. The assertions are clear and correct.


138-139: Test case for GET request is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly for GET requests. The assertion is clear and correct.


153-154: Test case for GET request with integer parameter is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly for GET requests with integer parameters. The assertion is clear and correct.


169-170: Test case for POST request is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly for POST requests. The assertion is clear and correct.


183-190: Test case for POST request with file upload is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly for POST requests with file uploads. The assertions are clear and correct.


Line range hint 226-229: New test case structure is correct.

The new test case structure includes name, data, rules, expectData, and expectErr fields, which is a good practice for organizing test cases.


Line range hint 266-267: Test case for success without cast data is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly without casting the data. The assertions are clear and correct.


Line range hint 310-311: Test case for success with cast data is correct.

The test case verifies that the validation works correctly with cast data. The assertions are clear and correct.

validation/validator.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 2, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 3, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 3, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@devhaozi devhaozi changed the title fix:[#450] The image rule of validation is wrong fix: [#450] The image rule of validation is wrong Jul 3, 2024
@devhaozi
Copy link
Member

devhaozi commented Jul 3, 2024

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.

@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl merged commit 9e18217 into v1.14.x Jul 3, 2024
7 of 10 checks passed
@hwbrzzl hwbrzzl deleted the bowen/#450-1 branch July 3, 2024 09:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants