Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub Workflows security hardening #2274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2022
Merged

Conversation

sashashura
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds explicit permissions section to workflows. This is a security best practice because by default workflows run with extended set of permissions (except from on: pull_request from external forks). By specifying any permission explicitly all others are set to none. By using the principle of least privilege the damage a compromised workflow can do (because of an injection or compromised third party tool or action) is restricted.
It is recommended to have most strict permissions on the top level and grant write permissions on job level case by case.

@eamonnmcmanus
Copy link
Member

Thanks, I agree that this makes sense.

@eamonnmcmanus eamonnmcmanus merged commit c33e03b into google:master Dec 8, 2022
@Marcono1234
Copy link
Collaborator

Should this for completeness also be applied to the other workflows? Though I guess they might need a few more permissions, they upload artifacts and CodeQL analysis creates security events.

@sashashura
Copy link
Contributor Author

The other workflows run on pull_request that has read permissions only. The codeql workflow already has permissions.

@Marcono1234
Copy link
Collaborator

Ah you are right, thanks for the explanation!

tibor-universe pushed a commit to getuniverse/gson that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2023
Signed-off-by: Alex <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Alex <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c33e03b)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants