Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove syzkaller #4049

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Remove syzkaller #4049

wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Collaborator

It's not used anymore, keeping it around complicates things, if we need it again, we can revert.

@@ -610,7 +609,7 @@ def __init__(self,
self._command = get_command_line_for_application(
testcase_path, needs_http=needs_http)

def run(self, round_number: int) -> CrashResult:
def run(self, round_number):
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like there are some unintentional changes here.

@@ -1243,9 +1198,6 @@ def setup_regular_build(revision,
build_class = build_setup_host.RemoteRegularBuild
elif environment.platform() == 'FUCHSIA':
build_class = FuchsiaBuild
elif (environment.is_android_cuttlefish() and
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this an OK change?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this should be fine.

@jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TODO: THere are some changes to adb that probably should not be made.

@@ -1243,9 +1198,6 @@ def setup_regular_build(revision,
build_class = build_setup_host.RemoteRegularBuild
elif environment.platform() == 'FUCHSIA':
build_class = FuchsiaBuild
elif (environment.is_android_cuttlefish() and
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ def linkify_kernel_or_lkl_stacktrace_if_needed(crash_info):
"""Linkify Android Kernel or lkl stacktrace."""
kernel_prefix = ''
kernel_hash = ''
if (environment.is_android_kernel() and
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this change is from a revert but @marktefftech do you know what it should be now?

@marktefftech
Copy link
Collaborator

marktefftech commented Jul 3, 2024

Acknowledging that you've tagged me for review at individual LOC, it's my understanding that our kernel fuzzing is now completely decoupled from ClusterFuzz (replaced by Syzbot).

So, although I don't own the kernel code, I think it's safe to go ahead and eliminate anything to do with kernel fuzzing assuming it's only being used by Android.

@@ -1243,9 +1198,6 @@ def setup_regular_build(revision,
build_class = build_setup_host.RemoteRegularBuild
elif environment.platform() == 'FUCHSIA':
build_class = FuchsiaBuild
elif (environment.is_android_cuttlefish() and
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this should be fine.

@marktefftech
Copy link
Collaborator

(Let me know if you want me to loop in a member of the kernel team, but like I said, this should be fine).

@jonathanmetzman
Copy link
Collaborator Author

(Let me know if you want me to loop in a member of the kernel team, but like I said, this should be fine).

Yeah if you can loop in someone who worked on this and can confirm we don't need it anymore, that would be great.
Maybe @hzawawy ?

@eprucka3
Copy link

eprucka3 commented Jul 3, 2024

Yeah if you can loop in someone who worked on this and can confirm we don't need it anymore, that would be great.

I can confirm; we no longer use Clusterfuzz with our Syzkaller infra.

@hzawawy
Copy link
Collaborator

hzawawy commented Jul 3, 2024

Yeah if you can loop in someone who worked on this and can confirm we don't need it anymore, that would be great.

I can confirm; we no longer use Clusterfuzz with our Syzkaller infra.

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants