Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update section 5.12 README.hebrew.md #1271

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ShaiDemri
Copy link

Translate section 5.12 to Hebrew in README.hebrew.md

Translate section 5.12 to Hebrew in README.hebrew.md
Translate the link to section 5.12 to Hebrew
@goldbergyoni
Copy link
Owner

@hodbauer Wanna have a look at Hebrew enhancements and approve?


**אמ;לק:** Store any type of _data_ (e.g. user sessions, cache, uploaded files) within external data stores. When the app holds data in-process this adds additional layer of maintenance complexity like routing users to the same instance and higher cost of restarting a process. To enforce and encourage a stateless approach, most modern runtime platforms allows 'reapp-ing' instances periodically
**אמ;לק:** אחסנו כל סוג של מידע (לדוג׳ ביקור פעיל של משתמש, זכרון מטמון, קבצים שהועלו) באחסון נתונים חיצוני. שמירת נתונים בתוך תהליך התוכנה מוסיף עוד רובד של סיבוך בתחזוקה כמו ניתוב משתמשים לאותו מופע ועלות גבוהה יותר לאתחול מחדש של התהליך. על מנת לאכוף ולעודד תוכנה לנקוט בגישה נטולת-מצב, רוב פלטפורמות זמן הריצה מאפשרות לבצע 'reapp-ing' למופעים מעת לעת.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ShaiDemri Thanks for helping translate to Hebrew.

  1. I guess that there is a mistake in the source about the reapp-ing because as far as I know this is not a valid word. @goldbergyoni What you think about the misspelling in the English version?
  2. please add : after the אחרת.
  3. please change the קרא עוד to לקריאה נוספת

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants