-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use utils Trim functions instead of the strings/bytes functions #3087
Conversation
ReneWerner87
commented
Jul 24, 2024
- Performance improvement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
WalkthroughThe changes across the codebase focus on replacing standard string manipulation functions from the Go Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
Client->>Server: Request
Server->>Server: Trim spaces using utils.Trim
Server->>Client: Response
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3087 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.60% 83.64% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 8342 8342
==========================================
+ Hits 6974 6978 +4
+ Misses 1044 1041 -3
+ Partials 324 323 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
middleware/pprof/pprof.go (1)
75-75
: Ensure test coverage for the new utility function.The change from
strings.TrimRight
toutils.TrimRight
looks good and maintains the intended functionality.However, no test cases covering the
utils.TrimRight
function were found. Please add appropriate test cases to ensure this utility function is covered by tests.
- File:
middleware/pprof/pprof.go
- Line: 75
Analysis chain
Ensure test coverage for the new utility function.
The change from
strings.TrimRight
toutils.TrimRight
looks good and maintains the intended functionality.However, ensure that this change is covered by tests.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for the new utility function `utils.TrimRight`. # Test: Search for test cases covering the `utils.TrimRight` function. Expect: Test cases covering the utility function. rg --type go -A 5 $'utils.TrimRight'Length of output: 3147
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for the new utility function `utils.TrimRight`. # Search for test cases in Go test files that might be covering the `utils.TrimRight` function. rg --type go -l '_test.go' | xargs rg 'utils.TrimRight'Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for the new utility function `utils.TrimRight`. # Search for any references to `TrimRight` in Go test files. rg --type go -l '_test.go' | xargs rg 'TrimRight'Length of output: 47
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 75-75: middleware/pprof/pprof.go#L75
Added line #L75 was not covered by testsmount.go (1)
43-43
: Implementation ofutils.TrimRight
is missing.The function
utils.TrimRight
is used in multiple places across the codebase, but its implementation could not be found. This is a critical issue that needs to be addressed.
- Ensure that
utils.TrimRight
is implemented correctly in theutils
package.Analysis chain
Change approved.
The replacement of
strings.TrimRight
withutils.TrimRight
aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing performance and consistency.However, ensure that all usages of
utils.TrimRight
are correct and consistent.Also applies to: 73-73
Ensure
utils.TrimRight
is correctly implemented and used consistently.The function
utils.TrimRight
is used in multiple places across the codebase. To verify its correctness, please review its implementation.
Ensure
utils.TrimRight
is correctly implemented and used consistently.The function
utils.TrimRight
is used in multiple places across the codebase. To verify its correctness, please review its implementation.
Ensure
utils.TrimRight
is correctly implemented and used consistently.The function
utils.TrimRight
is used in multiple places across the codebase. To verify its correctness, please review its implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `utils.TrimRight` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct and consistent usage. rg --type go -A 5 $'utils.TrimRight'Length of output: 3147
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `utils.TrimRight`. # Test: Search for the definition of the function `TrimRight` in the `utils` package. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func TrimRight($_, $_) $_'Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `utils.TrimRight`. # Test: Search for the definition of the function `TrimRight` in the `utils` package. rg --type go 'func TrimRight'Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `utils.TrimRight`. # Test: Search for the term `TrimRight` in all files to locate its definition. rg 'TrimRight'Length of output: 758
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.mod
is excluded by!**/*.mod
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
,!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (11)
- client/response.go (2 hunks)
- ctx.go (5 hunks)
- helpers.go (4 hunks)
- middleware/cors/cors.go (2 hunks)
- middleware/csrf/csrf.go (2 hunks)
- middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go (2 hunks)
- middleware/pprof/pprof.go (2 hunks)
- mount.go (3 hunks)
- path.go (3 hunks)
- redirect.go (1 hunks)
- router.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
middleware/pprof/pprof.go
[warning] 75-75: middleware/pprof/pprof.go#L75
Added line #L75 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (26)
middleware/pprof/pprof.go (1)
8-8
: Import statement looks good.The new dependency on
github.com/gofiber/utils/v2
is correctly added.client/response.go (1)
70-70
: Ensure test coverage for the new utility function.The change from
strings.TrimSpace
toutils.Trim
looks good and maintains the intended functionality.However, ensure that this change is covered by tests.
middleware/cors/cors.go (3)
9-9
: Import statement looks good.The new dependency on
github.com/gofiber/utils/v2
is correctly added.
48-48
: Ensure test coverage for the new utility function.The change from
strings.TrimSpace
toutils.Trim
looks good and maintains the intended functionality.However, ensure that this change is covered by tests.
Verification successful
Ensure test coverage for
utils.Trim
function inmiddleware/cors/cors.go
.The
utils.Trim
function is used in multiple files, including test files. Specifically, it appears inmiddleware/csrf/csrf_test.go
. Ensure that these test cases comprehensively cover the changes made inmiddleware/cors/cors.go
.
- Files to review for test coverage:
middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage for the new utility function `utils.Trim`. # Test: Search for test cases covering the `utils.Trim` function. Expect: Test cases covering the utility function. rg --type go -A 5 $'utils.Trim'Length of output: 7094
56-56
: Ensure test coverage for the new utility function.The change from
strings.TrimSpace
toutils.Trim
looks good and maintains the intended functionality.However, ensure that this change is covered by tests.
mount.go (1)
11-12
: Import statement approved.The import statement for
github.com/gofiber/utils/v2
is necessary for using theutils.TrimRight
function.redirect.go (2)
Line range hint
11-12
:
Import statement approved.The import statement for
github.com/gofiber/utils/v2
is necessary for using theutils.Trim
function.
252-252
: Change approved.The replacement of
strings.Trim
withutils.Trim
aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing performance and consistency.However, ensure that all usages of
utils.Trim
are correct and consistent.Also applies to: 255-255
middleware/csrf/csrf.go (2)
11-12
: Import statement approved.The import statement for
github.com/gofiber/utils/v2
is necessary for using theutils.Trim
function.
66-66
: Change approved.The replacement of
strings.TrimSpace
withutils.Trim
aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing performance and consistency.However, ensure that all usages of
utils.Trim
are correct and consistent.Also applies to: 74-74
router.go (2)
256-256
: Approved: Use ofutils.TrimRight
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.TrimRight
withutils.TrimRight
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.
327-327
: Approved: Use ofutils.TrimRight
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.TrimRight
withutils.TrimRight
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.helpers.go (4)
225-225
: Approved: Use ofutils.TrimRight
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.TrimRight
withutils.TrimRight
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.
339-339
: Approved: Use ofutils.TrimLeft
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.TrimLeft
withutils.TrimLeft
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.
359-359
: Approved: Use ofutils.TrimLeft
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.TrimLeft
withutils.TrimLeft
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.
462-462
: Approved: Use ofutils.Trim
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.Trim
withutils.Trim
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.path.go (3)
54-54
: Approved: Explicit type declaration forslashDelimiterStr
.The explicit type declaration for
slashDelimiterStr
asbyte
improves type safety and readability.
164-164
: Approved: Use ofutils.TrimRight
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.TrimRight
withutils.TrimRight
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.
236-236
: Approved: Use ofutils.TrimRight
for consistency.The replacement of
strings.TrimRight
withutils.TrimRight
enhances consistency in string manipulation across the codebase.middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go (2)
251-253
: LGTM! But verify the usage ofutils.Trim
.The change to use
utils.Trim(header, ' ')
instead ofstrings.TrimSpace(header)
looks good and should improve consistency.Ensure that
utils.Trim
is correctly used across the codebase.Verification successful
Verified: The usage of
utils.Trim
is consistent across the codebase.The change to use
utils.Trim(header, ' ')
instead ofstrings.TrimSpace(header)
inmiddleware/csrf/csrf_test.go
is appropriate and aligns with other instances ofutils.Trim
usage.
middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go
lines 251-253Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `utils.Trim` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of `utils.Trim`. rg --type go -A 5 $'utils.Trim'Length of output: 7094
142-144
: LGTM! But verify the usage ofutils.Trim
.The change to use
utils.Trim(header, ' ')
instead ofstrings.TrimSpace(header)
looks good and should improve consistency.Ensure that
utils.Trim
is correctly used across the codebase.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Usage of
utils.Trim
is consistent across the codebaseThe change to use
utils.Trim(header, ' ')
instead ofstrings.TrimSpace(header)
is consistent with the usage ofutils.Trim
across the codebase.
middleware/csrf/csrf_test.go
: Lines 142-144redirect.go
: Lines 1-5router.go
: Lines 1-5path.go
: Lines 1-5mount.go
: Lines 1-5helpers.go
: Lines 1-5ctx.go
: Lines 1-5middleware/pprof/pprof.go
: Lines 1-5middleware/csrf/csrf.go
: Lines 1-5middleware/cors/cors.go
: Lines 1-5client/response.go
: Lines 1-5Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `utils.Trim` across the codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of `utils.Trim`. rg --type go -A 5 $'utils.Trim'Length of output: 7094
ctx.go (5)
831-831
: Verify the utility functionutils.TrimRight
.Ensure that
utils.TrimRight
behaves as expected and handles edge cases correctly.
942-942
: Verify the utility functionutils.TrimRight
.Ensure that
utils.TrimRight
behaves as expected and handles edge cases correctly.
1813-1813
: Verify the utility functionutils.TrimRight
.Ensure that
utils.TrimRight
behaves as expected and handles edge cases correctly.
865-865
: Verify the utility functionutils.TrimLeft
.Ensure that
utils.TrimLeft
behaves as expected and handles edge cases correctly.
781-781
: Verify the utility functionutils.TrimRight
.Ensure that
utils.TrimRight
behaves as expected and handles edge cases correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.50
.
Benchmark suite | Current: 7e16a76 | Previous: e2cd100 | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
Benchmark_Compress_Levels/Zstd_LevelBestCompression - B/op |
1 B/op |
0 B/op |
+∞ |
Benchmark_Compress_Parallel/Zstd - B/op |
2 B/op |
0 B/op |
+∞ |
Benchmark_AppendMsgitem - MB/s |
2706.94 MB/s |
1778.55 MB/s |
1.52 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- middleware/cache/manager_msgp_test.go (4 hunks)
- middleware/csrf/manager_msgp_test.go (4 hunks)
- middleware/limiter/manager_msgp_test.go (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- middleware/cache/manager_msgp_test.go
- middleware/csrf/manager_msgp_test.go
- middleware/limiter/manager_msgp_test.go
* Use utils Trim functions instead of the strings/bytes functions * rename Test and Benchmark functions with same name