🐛 bug: fasthttp errors cause panic when Params is used #3055
Conversation
efectn
requested review from
gaby,
sixcolors and
ReneWerner87
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce a new method, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Tip Early access features: enabledWe are currently testing the following features in early access:
Note:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3055 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 83.04% 82.97% -0.08%
==========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 8315 8316 +1
==========================================
- Hits 6905 6900 -5
- Misses 1077 1081 +4
- Partials 333 335 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- ctx.go (1 hunks)
- ctx_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
ctx.go (2)
Line range hint
989-1006: Addition ofRoute()method to handle nil route scenariosThe new
Route()method effectively addresses the issue wherectx.routecould be nil, particularly after a body limit error, by safely returning a defaultRouteobject ifc.routeis nil. This change is crucial for preventing the panic described in the PR objectives and ensures thatctx.AllParams()and similar methods can operate safely without causing runtime panics.
Line range hint
988-1006: Refactoring ofParams()to use newRoute()methodThe modification in the
Params()method to utilize the newly addedRoute()method ensures that route parameter retrieval is safe, even whenc.routemight be nil. This change is crucial for the stability and reliability of the application, especially in error handling scenarios wherectx.routecould be unset due to premature termination of request processing (like a body limit error).ctx_test.go (13)
2369-2386: Review ofTest_Ctx_Params_ErrorHandler_Panic_Issue_2832:The test function
Test_Ctx_Params_ErrorHandler_Panic_Issue_2832is designed to simulate a scenario where a large request body triggers an error, and the error handler attempts to access route parameters. The setup involves configuring the application with a custom error handler and a body limit. The test then sends a request that exceeds this limit and checks if the error is handled as expected.This test is crucial for ensuring that the application behaves correctly under error conditions and does not lead to unexpected crashes or behavior. It also helps to verify that the error handling mechanism is robust and can gracefully handle errors triggered by large request bodies.
Overall, the test appears to be well-structured and effectively tests the intended scenario. It is a valuable addition to the test suite as it helps to ensure the stability and reliability of the application under error conditions.
Line range hint
2388-2405: Review ofTest_Ctx_Params_Case_Sensitive:The function
Test_Ctx_Params_Case_Sensitivechecks the case sensitivity of parameter extraction from the context. It sets up routes with parameters in various cases and tests if the parameters are correctly retrieved in a case-sensitive manner.This test is essential for ensuring that the framework handles URL parameters accurately, respecting the case sensitivity settings. Proper handling of case sensitivity in URL parameters can prevent bugs related to routing and parameter retrieval, which might lead to security issues or incorrect application behavior.
The test is well-implemented and covers the necessary aspects of case sensitivity in parameter handling. It is a good practice to have such tests to prevent regressions in future changes.
Line range hint
2406-2418: Review ofBenchmark_Ctx_Params:The benchmark
Benchmark_Ctx_Paramsis designed to measure the performance of theParamsmethod in the context object. It sets up a scenario where the context has predefined parameters, and it repeatedly retrieves these parameters to measure performance.This benchmark is crucial for understanding the performance characteristics of parameter retrieval, which is a common operation in web applications. The setup appears correct, and the benchmark runs the parameter retrieval operation multiple times to get a reliable measurement.
It is good practice to include such benchmarks in the test suite as they help identify performance regressions and optimize critical parts of the framework.
Line range hint
2419-2428: Review ofTest_Ctx_Path:The function
Test_Ctx_Pathtests thePathmethod of the context object, which retrieves the current request path. The test checks if the method accurately returns the path for various requests, including those with special characters and URL encoding.Testing the
Pathmethod is crucial because it impacts routing and middleware functionality. Ensuring that this method behaves correctly under different scenarios prevents bugs in route handling and improves the robustness of the application.The test is well-structured and covers a range of scenarios, from simple paths to those involving special characters and URL encoding. This thorough testing is excellent for ensuring the reliability of the
Pathmethod.
Line range hint
2429-2437: Review ofTest_Ctx_Protocol:The function
Test_Ctx_Protocoltests theProtocolmethod of the context object, which retrieves the HTTP protocol version used in the request. The test checks if the method correctly identifies HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 protocols based on the request headers.Testing the protocol retrieval is important for applications that might behave differently based on the HTTP version, such as those using specific features available only in HTTP/2. Ensuring accurate protocol identification helps in correctly tailoring the response and functionalities to the capabilities of the client's HTTP version.
The test covers the necessary scenarios and is implemented correctly, providing assurance that the
Protocolmethod functions as expected.
Line range hint
2438-2446: Review ofTest_Ctx_Scheme:The function
Test_Ctx_Schemetests theSchememethod of the context object, which determines the URL scheme (http or https) of the request. The test checks the method's ability to correctly identify the scheme based on various headers likeX-Forwarded-Proto,X-Forwarded-Protocol,X-Forwarded-Ssl, andX-Url-Scheme.Correctly identifying the URL scheme is crucial for security purposes, such as enforcing HTTPS on sensitive pages, and for functionality that depends on the nature of the connection (secure or not). It is also essential for generating correct absolute URLs in responses.
The test is comprehensive and covers multiple scenarios, ensuring that the
Schememethod behaves reliably across different configurations and header setups. This thorough testing is critical for maintaining the security and functionality of web applications that rely on scheme-specific behavior.
Line range hint
2447-2455: Review ofBenchmark_Ctx_Scheme:The benchmark
Benchmark_Ctx_Schememeasures the performance of theSchememethod in the context object under various scenarios, including different headers and configurations that affect scheme determination.Performance benchmarking for this method is valuable because it is often called in web applications, especially those that enforce or react differently based on the request scheme. Knowing the performance characteristics helps in optimizing the method and ensuring that it does not become a bottleneck in request processing.
The benchmark is set up correctly, running multiple iterations and covering different scenarios to provide a comprehensive view of the method's performance. This approach helps in identifying potential performance issues and areas for optimization.
Line range hint
2456-2460: Review ofTest_Ctx_Vary:The function
Test_Ctx_Varytests theVarymethod of the context object, which manipulates theVaryHTTP header. The test checks if the method correctly sets theVaryheader based on the input headers provided.Proper handling of the
Varyheader is crucial for correct content delivery and caching behavior, especially in environments with diverse client configurations and capabilities. TheVaryheader helps caches understand how to store and serve different versions of a resource.The test is well-implemented, covering multiple scenarios and ensuring that the
Varymethod behaves as expected. This is important for maintaining the efficiency and correctness of HTTP caching mechanisms in web applications.
Line range hint
2461-2465: Review ofBenchmark_Ctx_Vary:The benchmark
Benchmark_Ctx_Varymeasures the performance of theVarymethod in the context object. It tests the method's efficiency in setting theVaryHTTP header under repeated calls.Performance benchmarking for this method is important because it is frequently used in responses that require specific caching behaviors based on the request headers. The setup of the benchmark is appropriate, and it runs multiple iterations to ensure reliable measurements.
This benchmark is useful for identifying potential performance bottlenecks in the
Varymethod and for ensuring that it performs efficiently in high-load scenarios.
Line range hint
2466-2474: Review ofTest_Ctx_Set:The function
Test_Ctx_Settests theSetmethod of the context object, which is used to set response headers. The test checks if the method correctly sets various headers and handles cases of overwriting existing headers.Proper functionality of the
Setmethod is crucial as it directly affects the HTTP response headers, which can influence caching, security, and content negotiation. The test covers multiple scenarios, including setting new headers and overwriting existing ones, which is important for verifying the method's behavior in real-world applications.The test is well-structured and effectively ensures that the
Setmethod behaves as expected, maintaining the integrity and correctness of response headers.
Line range hint
2475-2482: Review ofBenchmark_Ctx_Set:The benchmark
Benchmark_Ctx_Setmeasures the performance of theSetmethod in the context object. It tests how efficiently the method can set response headers, which is a frequent operation in web applications.Performance benchmarking for the
Setmethod is critical because it is involved in every HTTP response, and its efficiency can impact the overall response time. The benchmark is set up correctly, testing the method under repeated calls to simulate a high-load scenario.This benchmark is valuable for identifying potential optimizations in the
Setmethod to enhance the performance of web applications.
Line range hint
2483-2490: Review ofTest_Ctx_Status:The function
Test_Ctx_Statustests theStatusmethod of the context object, which sets the HTTP status code for the response. The test checks if the method correctly sets various status codes and ensures that the response body and status are correctly aligned.Accurately setting the status code is crucial as it informs the client about the outcome of their request, affecting client-side logic and user experience. The test effectively covers different scenarios, including normal and error status codes, which is essential for ensuring robust and predictable behavior in web applications.
The test is well-implemented, providing confidence that the
Statusmethod functions correctly across different use cases.
Line range hint
2499-2505: Review ofBenchmark_Ctx_Type:The benchmark
Benchmark_Ctx_Typemeasures the performance of theTypemethod in the context object. It tests how efficiently the method can set theContent-Typeheader, which is a common operation in web applications, especially those serving various types of content.Understanding the performance of the
Typemethod is important because it can affect the response time, especially in content-heavy applications. The benchmark is set up correctly, running multiple iterations and covering different content types to ensure comprehensive performance data.This benchmark is valuable for identifying potential optimizations in the
Typemethod to enhance the performance and responsiveness of web applications.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- ctx.go (1 hunks)
- ctx_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- ctx.go
- ctx_test.go
Description
Fixes #2832
Type of change
Checklist
Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:
/docs/directory for Fiber's documentation.Commit formatting
Please use emojis in commit messages for an easy way to identify the purpose or intention of a commit. Check out the emoji cheatsheet here: CONTRIBUTING.md