Skip to content

Fix some package registry problems #34759

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

Fix some package registry problems #34759

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2025

Conversation

@wxiaoguang
Copy link
Contributor

@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang commented Jun 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Jun 18, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/templates This PR modifies the template files label Jun 18, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang marked this pull request as draft June 18, 2025 05:26
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang force-pushed the fix-package-various branch from d9a752b to 2aab9b1 Compare June 18, 2025 05:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added modifies/api This PR adds API routes or modifies them modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code labels Jun 18, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang changed the title WIP: Fix some package registry problems Fix some package registry problems Jun 18, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang added this to the 1.25.0 milestone Jun 18, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang force-pushed the fix-package-various branch from 2aab9b1 to 3054104 Compare June 18, 2025 06:04
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2025 06:04
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang force-pushed the fix-package-various branch 5 times, most recently from 889fd15 to 76818db Compare June 18, 2025 07:23
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang force-pushed the fix-package-various branch from 76818db to fb9cdb5 Compare June 18, 2025 15:32
@silverwind
Copy link
Member

silverwind commented Jun 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

image

Maybe content in Image Layers could use tw-font-mono because its essentially code?

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Jun 18, 2025
@lunny lunny mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2025
Closed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Jun 18, 2025
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang merged commit a2ae7c6 into go-gitea:main Jun 18, 2025
26 checks passed
@wxiaoguang wxiaoguang deleted the fix-package-various branch June 18, 2025 16:32
@silverwind
Copy link
Member

Maybe content in Image Layers could use tw-font-mono because its essentially code?

It happens to be ugly due to the last char is wrapped. I think the problem is related to the abuses of issue-content-left and issue-content-right, but I don't want to make more changes in this PR ....

image

I guess if these hashes ever become longer, the wrapping there will be a problem regardless.

zjjhot added a commit to zjjhot/gitea that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
@zjjhot
Merge remote-tracking branch 'giteaofficial/main'
8f883a1 
* giteaofficial/main:
  [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin
  Upgrade `gopls` to v0.19.0, add `make fix` (go-gitea#34772)
  Refactor packages (func name & UI) (go-gitea#34773)
  Fix remaining issues after `gopls modernize` formatting (go-gitea#34771)
  Fix some package registry problems (go-gitea#34759)
  Fix incorrect cli default values and default command (go-gitea#34765)
  Support annotated tags when using create release API (go-gitea#31840)
  when using rules to delete packages, remove unclean bugs (go-gitea#34632)
  Fix readme path and markdown link paste (go-gitea#34755)
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 16, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

@lunny lunny lunny approved these changes

@silverwind silverwind silverwind approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/api This PR adds API routes or modifies them modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code modifies/templates This PR modifies the template files

Projects

None yet

Milestone

1.25.0

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a nice way of editing auto-generated installation instructions on PyPi packages.

4 participants

@wxiaoguang @silverwind @lunny @GiteaBot