Add more bench

[sapk]

Add some bench for testing so I propose to add them.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #3161 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #3161   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    34.9%   34.9%           
======================================
  Files         277     277           
  Lines       40108   40108           
======================================
  Hits        14000   14000           
  Misses      24059   24059           
  Partials     2049    2049

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
models/unit_tests.go	78.02% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
modules/indexer/indexer.go	70% <0%> (-7.5%)	⬇️
models/repo.go	43.38% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
modules/process/manager.go	81.15% <0%> (+4.34%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a995ad9...be7deb6. Read the comment docs.

[lafriks]

LGTM

[ethantkoenig]

Should these prints be removed (also line 113)?

[ethantkoenig]

I think this can be simplified. Just make samples a list of repo IDs, and load the owner and repo in the main loop. We can get rid of the anonymous struct and this first loop.

for _, repoID := range repoIDs {
	repo := models.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(b, &models.Repository{ID: repoID}).(*models.Repository)
	owner := models.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(b, &models.User{ID: repo.OwnerID}).(*models.User)
	... // run test
}

[ethantkoenig]

branchName could begin with a slash, in which case it would not be a valid branch name

[ethantkoenig]

Would "WebViewCommit" be a better name? The :owner/:repo/commit/:sha endpoint doesn't necessarily have anything to do with branches.

[ethantkoenig]

LGTM