Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix commit sha1 URL rendering in markdown #1677

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 5, 2017

Conversation

lafriks
Copy link
Member

@lafriks lafriks commented May 4, 2017

Fixes #1667

@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ func TestRender_Commits(t *testing.T) {
test(sha, `<p><a href="`+commit+`" rel="nofollow">b6dd6210ea</a></p>`)
test(commit, `<p><a href="`+commit+`" rel="nofollow">b6dd6210ea</a></p>`)
test(tree, `<p><a href="`+src+`" rel="nofollow">b6dd6210ea/src</a></p>`)
test("commit "+sha, `<p>commit <a href="`+commit+`" rel="nofollow">b6dd6210ea</a></p>`)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I won't ask for this PR but it would be better if the short sha is not hardcoded but derived from sha in test result (in the future ^^).

@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ func RenderCrossReferenceIssueIndexPattern(rawBytes []byte, urlPrefix string, me
func renderSha1CurrentPattern(rawBytes []byte, urlPrefix string) []byte {
ms := Sha1CurrentPattern.FindAllSubmatch(rawBytes, -1)
for _, m := range ms {
all := m[0]
all := m[1]
Copy link
Member

@sapk sapk May 4, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should not call it all now that it right fully catch only the commitId/sha1.

@sapk
Copy link
Member

sapk commented May 4, 2017

I have made two comments that are non blocking just improvement. Otherwise LGTM.

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label May 4, 2017
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone May 5, 2017
@lunny lunny added the type/bug label May 5, 2017
@appleboy
Copy link
Member

appleboy commented May 5, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels May 5, 2017
@lafriks
Copy link
Member Author

lafriks commented May 5, 2017

Changed variable name as requested :)

@lunny lunny merged commit 9a0b0da into go-gitea:master May 5, 2017
@lafriks lafriks deleted the issue/1667 branch May 7, 2017 16:42
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issues: Commit hash not parsed
5 participants