Updating the GraphQL queries for enterprise and org member data (saml identities, scim identities, emails for EMUs)

[stacycarter]

This PR is to update various GraphQL queries for listing enterprise or organization member details such as SAML identities, SCIM identities, enterprise member email addresses (emails for EMU enterprises specifically), and other details.

The query that should be used from this list and the output that is returned will depend on both the type of GitHub Enterprise Cloud enterprise (EMU or non-EMU), and the type of authentication/SCIM configuration that is in place.

List of queries being added/updated:

• emu-list-enterprise-member-email-addresses.graphql
• saml-identities-enterprise-level.graphql
• saml-identities-single-organization.graphql
• scim-emu-enterprises-list-scim-identities.graphql
• scim-emu-list-enterprise-scim-identities.graphql
• scim-identities-all-orgs-in-enterprise.graphql
• scim-identities-single-organization.graphql

List of query files being removed (for cleanup and to avoid duplication since the queries above should take are of it)

• users-in-org-with-sso.graphql
• enterprise-sso-member-details.graphql
• 13-members-with-scim-identity-enterprise.graphql
• 12-members-with-scim-identity-org.graphql

[sn2b]

Hi @stacycarter 👋🏻 The queries all seem to work fine. I just have a couple of "cleanup" points. I don't know if there is a best practice or skeleton to use for this repo, but I'd like to point out a couple things:

• Some queries start with query { while others don't. E.g. the explorer seems to fail without the query present.
• Including or not including pagination. Some queries have the pageInfo but don't use it and some don't have it at all. For "simple" queries, meaning ones that only have one first, we could think about just adding in pagination. Alternatively I might be inclined to leave it out entirely.
• Similarly for the slug for example, some queries use the variables externally and some pass it straight through. I personally think it would be good to have a uniform way of approaching this, tbh either way is fine in my opinion for these little test scripts.

Let me know if you want to chat about this. I am also open to hear other opinions. Like I said, the queries work and I'd be happy to approve this either way, I just thought I'd mention it.

[sn2b]

Just saw your comment in the #support-squad-ecosystem Slack thread about adding pagination later! Sorry I missed that earlier.

[stacycarter]

Thanks for the review and the helpful comments @sn2b! ❤️ I completely agree - I think the queries need to be cleaned up and made more consistent. I'm thinking what we could do is merge the changes we have in this PR, and then as time allows, a new PR could be opened to make the improvements that you mentioned above.