API Libraries Design update

[F4NT0]

Why:

Resolving the Issue #352

What's being changed:

• GIF showing the visual Change

• One Example of how the markdown is organized, to be more easy to increase the number of Libraries

### JavaScript

Library name | Oficial Github Repository |
|---|---|
**NodeJS Github library**| [pksunkara/octonode](https://github.com/pksunkara/octonode)
**gh3 client-side API v3 wrapper**| [k33g/gh3](https://github.com/k33g/gh3)
**Github.js wrapper around the Github API**|[michael/github](https://github.com/michael/github)
**Promise-Based CoffeeScript library for the Browser or NodeJS**|[philschatz/github-client](https://github.com/philschatz/github-client)

Check off the following:

• All of the tests are passing.
• I have reviewed my changes in staging.
• For content changes, I have reviewed the localization checklist
• For content changes, I have reviewed the Content style guide for GitHub Docs.

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

[simpsoka]

This is great, thank you @F4NT0! From a product perspective - this definitely is easier to read, the content also gives more contextual information about the libraries. Would love to get this triaged, so cc'ing @heiskr for docs-engineering review.

[heiskr]

I like the look of the page for sure. There's a few changes I think we'd need to get this to a merge-able state.

• Where the table headings say "Oficial Github Repository".... I don't want to imply GitHub actually maintains these projects. Would it be possible to reduce to simply "Repository"?
• We also spell the company name "GitHub", with a capital "H". The brand folks are particular about that. Would it be possible to get those updated as well?
• We'd also prefer to not include changes to package.json and package-lock.json for the scope of this pull request. Its fine to be in the commit history as we squash commits, if you could run like git checkout main package.json package-lock.json and commit the reversion on those.

Thank you!

[runleonarun]

Thanks for contributing to this article, @F4NT0! I made some suggestions. Once these and @heiskr's suggestions are addressed, we can ship this PR!

[heiskr]

🙌🏼 Thank you 💃🏼

[github-actions]

This PR is stale because it has been open 7 days with no activity and will be automatically closed in 3 days. To keep this PR open, update the PR by adding a comment or pushing a commit.

[F4NT0]

Waiting for @runleonarun approve this PR!

[runleonarun]

@F4NT0 Thank you for the reminder! Nice work on this PR 🙇‍♀️