-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CAPA: Release v29.6.0. #1550
CAPA: Release v29.6.0. #1550
Conversation
… (proxy support for private clusters)
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/run releases-test-suites PROVIDER=capa |
|
/run releases-test-suites |
Is this release fixing something related to AWS Node Termination Handler? If so, please wait with releasing this. We were already about to do so or at least were talking about it. There are more things to be updated than just the AWS Node Termination Handler. Cabbage e.g. is just about to put in requests for a last Cilium patch and Shield recently requested Also I'd prefer using the new |
This is not yet merged to |
releases-test-suites
📋 View full results in Tekton Dashboard Rerun trigger: Tip To only re-run the failed test suites you can provide a Alternatively, or in addition to, you can also specify |
capa/v29.6.0/README.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ | |||
# :zap: Giant Swarm Release v29.6.0 for CAPA :zap: | |||
|
|||
<< Add description here >> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TODO
capa/v29.6.0/announcement.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
**Workload cluster release v29.6.0 for CAPA is available**. << Add description here >> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TODO
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Structure looks good to me, can't tell about the changes in general
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As stated before, I'd prefer starting to use the reworked devctl
approach in v30 earliest. It changes how the diffs look like, reorders manifests and still contains some issues around the templating in general (whitespaces, inconsistency in listing version numbers (sometimes with v, some without) and others).
Also I feel like the reduction in etcd volume size should have been shipped in a major release (and should probably also not be back-ported to v1.3.x 😉).
Same as for v28.5.0: May I suggest merging this PR on top of yours? As stated before, we'd prefer not using the new My suggestion therefore just reproduces what you already proposed by using the manual approach of copying and altering the previous minor release. |
The storage quota (see |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/run releases-test-suites PREVIOUS_RELEASE=29.5.0
You're absolutely right on that. From a Giant Swarm and technical point of view, the reduction probably doesn't hurt. But I don't know the customer / user point of view on this. So let's just hope nobody's complaining about it in the end. 😅
One note on that: Customers can configure the quota to 16 GB. Worst case and depending on how etcd is defragmenting / rewriting its database files and from my experience with databases, I'd expect this to consume twice the amount of the quota. So 32 GB. We can still further reduce it, but I'd not save in the wrong place. |
/run releases-test-suites PREVIOUS_RELEASE=29.5.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@giantswarm/team-cabbage could you also take a look? Particularly if the Cilium bump is fine?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cilium-wise LGTM
releases-test-suites
📋 View full results in Tekton Dashboard Rerun trigger: Tip To only re-run the failed test suites you can provide a Alternatively, or in addition to, you can also specify |
added release notes, please review |
/run releases-test-suites PREVIOUS_RELEASE=29.5.0 |
releases-test-suites
📋 View full results in Tekton Dashboard Rerun trigger: Tip To only re-run the failed test suites you can provide a Alternatively, or in addition to, you can also specify |
Towards giantswarm/roadmap#3795, https://github.com/giantswarm/giantswarm/issues/32487, https://github.com/giantswarm/giantswarm/issues/32045
Checklist