I started to add code for test build to test the iso boot.

[ericbsd]

Summary by Sourcery

Add a test build option to the build script for testing ISO boot with FreeBSD packages and improve variable naming for clarity.

New Features:

• Introduce a new test build option in the build script to test ISO boot with FreeBSD OS packages.

Enhancements:

• Correct variable naming inconsistencies in the build script for better readability and maintainability.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request adds support for a test build option to test ISO boot functionality. It modifies the build script to accommodate a new test mode, updates supported FreeBSD versions, and improves the help function output.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added support for a test build option	Introduced a new '-t' flag for test builds Created a new 'test' desktop option Added conditional logic to handle test builds differently Modified package selection for test builds Changed version naming for test builds	build.sh
Updated supported FreeBSD versions	Removed '13.2-STABLE', '14.0-STABLE', and '14.1-PRERELEASE' Added '13.3-STABLE'	build.sh
Improved help function output	Added newline characters to improve readability Included information about the new test option	build.sh
Refactored variable names for consistency	Changed 'PKGCONG' to 'PKG_CONF' Renamed 'cdroot' to 'cd_root' Updated 'liveuser' to 'live_user'	build.sh
Modified build process for test mode	Skipped certain steps (e.g., packages_software, desktop_config) for test builds Added conditional logic to use different base package lists for test builds	build.sh

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @ericbsd - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

• Consider refactoring to centralize test-specific logic for better maintainability.
• Standardize naming conventions throughout the script (e.g., choose either snake_case or camelCase consistently).

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟡 General issues: 1 issue found
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}