Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

workflows: nix: hardcode cachix ids, build unconditionally #5663

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2024

Conversation

SomeoneSerge
Copy link
Collaborator

GitHub does not expose environment and repository variables to PRs coming from forks => we've been disabling the Nix CI actions for most PRs. The if: also didn't make much sense, because we can always pull from cachix, and there's no point (albeit no risk either) in pushing cache for the untrusted code

CC @philiptaron

GitHub does not expose environment and repository variables to PRs
coming from forks => we've been disabling the Nix CI actions for most
PRs. The `if:` also didn't make much sense, because we can always pull from cachix,
and there's no point (albeit no risk either) in pushing cache for the untrusted code
@SomeoneSerge SomeoneSerge added the nix Issues specific to consuming flake.nix, or generally concerned with ❄ Nix-based llama.cpp deployment label Feb 22, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@philiptaron philiptaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I buy it.

@philiptaron philiptaron merged commit 4cb4d8b into ggerganov:master Feb 22, 2024
22 checks passed
jordankanter pushed a commit to jordankanter/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
…#5663)

GitHub does not expose environment and repository variables to PRs coming from forks implies that we've been disabling the Nix CI actions for most PRs. 

The `if:` also didn't make much sense, because we can always pull from cachix, and there's no point (albeit no risk either) in pushing cache for the untrusted code.
hodlen pushed a commit to hodlen/llama.cpp that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2024
…#5663)

GitHub does not expose environment and repository variables to PRs coming from forks implies that we've been disabling the Nix CI actions for most PRs. 

The `if:` also didn't make much sense, because we can always pull from cachix, and there's no point (albeit no risk either) in pushing cache for the untrusted code.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
nix Issues specific to consuming flake.nix, or generally concerned with ❄ Nix-based llama.cpp deployment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants