Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: Remove old transaction consumer from Freight #3237

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2022

Conversation

lynnagara
Copy link
Member

@lynnagara lynnagara commented Oct 11, 2022

This consumer is no longer running

This consumer is no longer processing any prod data
@lynnagara lynnagara requested a review from a team as a code owner October 11, 2022 21:05
@lynnagara lynnagara enabled auto-merge (squash) October 11, 2022 21:21
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Base: 92.29% // Head: 92.29% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (ee736bb) compared to base (94c83c3).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3237   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.29%   92.29%           
=======================================
  Files         698      698           
  Lines       31591    31591           
=======================================
  Hits        29158    29158           
  Misses       2433     2433           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@lynnagara lynnagara merged commit daa29a1 into master Oct 12, 2022
@lynnagara lynnagara deleted the remove-old-transaction-consumer-from-freight branch October 12, 2022 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants