fix: add condition for press actions

[RohitR311]

Add condition to check for selectors having press actions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved credential selector detection by expanding action type recognition
  • Enhanced credential extraction to support more user interaction types

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the credential handling logic in the RobotEdit.tsx component. The changes expand the criteria for identifying and extracting credentials by including 'press' actions alongside existing 'type' actions. This modification broadens the system's ability to recognize and process different types of user interactions when managing credentials, potentially increasing the flexibility of credential selection and extraction mechanisms.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/components/robot/RobotEdit.tsx	Modified findCredentialSelectors and extractInitialCredentials functions to include 'press' actions in credential selector identification and extraction

Possibly related PRs

• feat: ability to update credentials for robots with authentication #363: Improvements to site authentication and credential management functionality

Suggested reviewers

• amhsirak

Poem

🤖 A robotic tale of credential might,
Where 'press' and 'type' now dance in light
Selectors expanding, credentials unfurled
A rabbit's code magic, a more flexible world!
🐰✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79558b3 and bcfe314.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/components/robot/RobotEdit.tsx (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

src/components/robot/RobotEdit.tsx (2)

107-107: LGTM! Consider security implications of press actions.

The addition of 'press' actions alongside 'type' actions makes sense for comprehensive credential handling. However, ensure that this expansion doesn't introduce security vulnerabilities by validating and sanitizing press action inputs similarly to type actions.

---

107-107: Add test coverage for press actions.

Since this change affects credential handling, please add test cases to verify:

1. Credential extraction from press actions
2. Mixed type and press actions
3. Edge cases and input validation

Would you like me to help generate test cases for these scenarios?

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.