feat(ponytail): playbook skill + review scoping - #85
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 3 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR adds a new "playbook" sub-skill mode to ponytail. It introduces a skill-playbook.md document, exposes it via a SKILL_PLAYBOOK constant, extends config validation and command switching to recognize "playbook", and adds a Scope section to skill-review.md. ChangesPlaybook sub-skill addition
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Switcher
participant SubSkills
participant Config
User->>Switcher: "/ponytail-playbook"
Switcher->>Switcher: match prefix in sub-skill list
Switcher->>Config: normalize_config_mode("playbook")
Config-->>Switcher: validated mode "playbook"
Switcher-->>User: SwitchAction::SetMode("playbook")
User->>SubSkills: get("playbook")
SubSkills-->>User: SKILL_PLAYBOOK content
Possibly related issues
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@crates/ponytail/src/skill-review.md`:
- Around line 18-22: The default review scope in the skill-review guidance
currently misses brand-new untracked files because it relies on git diff HEAD
and git ls-files; update the default scope text in the skill-review document to
explicitly include untracked files. Adjust the wording near the “Default” scope
so it instructs reviewers to consider both tracked changes and new files not yet
added, while keeping the alternate branch/range/repo guidance intact.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 3e07f8d4-6c7a-47e6-ae9c-d09fa87c1eab
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
crates/ponytail/src/config.rscrates/ponytail/src/skill-playbook.mdcrates/ponytail/src/skill-review.mdcrates/ponytail/src/sub_skills.rscrates/ponytail/src/switcher.rs
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
82dde97 to
e59e503
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
playbookmode alongside the existing command modes.playbookis handled consistently across commands and settings.playbookdetection and routing.