chore: add CODEOWNERS - #239
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 1 minute Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a ChangesOwnership configuration
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
9e0b734 to
bef21f5
Compare
Auto-requests review from @getappz on every PR. Single wildcard rule since this is a single-maintainer repo today — split into path-scoped rules once there's more than one regular contributor.
bef21f5 to
1138e82
Compare
Summary
.github/CODEOWNERSwith a single wildcard rule (* @getappz) — auto-requests review on every PRgh api repos/getappz/agentflare/collaboratorsreturns only@getappz, so this is a single-maintainer repo today. Deliberately not splitting into per-path rules (crates/ vs src/ vs site/ etc.) since a granular ownership map with one name behind every path is ceremony, not real protection — worth revisiting once there's more than one regular contributor.Test plan
Summary by CodeRabbit