PB-1969 Improve Status Page #patch #49
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
✅ For the record, @stebie reviewed the templates and is ok with them according to our discussion in the Weekly Tech Docs meeting. |
pedroslvieira
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2025
Luke252
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2025
This is to make it easier for the person working on the incident repsonse to choose the right wording. I also changed the danger icon from a red cross (❌) to an alarm light (🚨). A red cross is rather use for a build error while the police light better reflects the urgency of the situation.
asteiner-swisstopo
force-pushed
the
feat-PB-1969-improve-status-page
branch
from
15206c6 to
194c27b
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changed two things in the Status Page based on feedback by @Luke252 in the review page for the Tech Docs and by @stebie informally after the presentation by @pedroslvieira:
Feel free to improve on this by adding more commits to elaborate on the points I did not pick up from the discussion in the review page.
Test link