-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Eager Loading Bug! #249
Comments
Woah! Nice find, I'll take a look after work 😊 |
My guess is that this condition should be modified to say: if (skip && !query.opts.includes) { I might have time to check if that works after lunch. Haven't gotten Model's tests running locally somehow. Need to take the time. |
Actually that could be the pre-query, not sure.. |
had an unusually long day at work, going to have to defer this to tomorrow 😞 ping me on twitter if i forget! i have it on my to-do list. |
Yeah no hard feelings, I had a long day too. Hope you beat those tasks back soon! |
Expected it to fail as I've had problems with this type of request (geddy#249), but was unable to replicate, the test is passing here.
I wrote a test for what I described, but it's passing. If I can't replicate this soon I'll just close it, maybe something else is going on. These tests seem to suggest that having an offset of 2 will wrap around the set if there are only two results for the query. |
Hey @ben-ng, it's been a while, but I think I found a bug in eager-loading when using it with pagination!
If I have a bunch of posts and their users, and I want to paginate, I might make a query like this:
which will first fetch the IDs of the relevant posts in an appropriate way, something like:
Which is working fine. The problem is that currently, the follow-up detail request KEEPS the offset, even when querying by ID, which means it skips all the correct results, and returns an empty array:
This breaks pagination when using eager loaded associations! I think I've boiled it down it should be a quick fix, so I might take a look in there, but I'm sure it would be easier for someone who already has worked with this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: