Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Show mappingRelevance #269

Open
nichtich opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Show mappingRelevance #269

nichtich opened this issue Feb 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
feature Additional functionality low priority maybe later question Further discussion needed

Comments

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

nichtich commented Feb 1, 2019

We will get automatic mapping recommendations with different levels of confidence. This can be encoded in JSKOS mapping field mappingRelevance, having a value between 0 and 1. This value, if given, should be displayed either graphically (▂▃▄▆▇█) or as rounded percent value (e.g. 78%). Results from reconciliation API might also be enriched with mappingRelevance for display their confidence.
@nichtich nichtich added the feature Additional functionality label Feb 1, 2019
@nichtich nichtich added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Feb 1, 2019
@stefandesu
Copy link
Member

Should this be right in the MappingBrowser, or rather in the MappingDetails? If the former, where exactly would you put it? Maybe in the same column as the "count" for the occurrences?

@nichtich
Copy link
Member Author

nichtich commented Feb 1, 2019

Both of course! Next to the count column seems good but the order of information in a MappingBrowser row must be revised anyway, how about this:

image

stefandesu added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 1, 2019
@stefandesu
Revise registry notation placement in MappingBrowser
f815dac 
Related to #269.
@nichtich nichtich added the low priority maybe later label Mar 13, 2019
@nichtich nichtich removed this from the 1.0.0 milestone Mar 13, 2019
@nichtich nichtich added the question Further discussion needed label Jun 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature Additional functionality low priority maybe later question Further discussion needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nichtich @stefandesu