Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

please consider using a standard license #19

Closed
ulrichard opened this issue May 12, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

please consider using a standard license #19

ulrichard opened this issue May 12, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@ulrichard
Copy link
Contributor

I'm in the process of packaging your library for debian. Now there came up an issue with the license. It is short and simple, and the intention seems clear, but there might be some ambiguities. As debian is very strict with licenses, it would be helpful, if you could adopt one of the standard licenses. The Expat / MIT license would probably be the closest to what you currently have.
I'm actually packaging the following fork : https://github.com/trezor/cython-hidapi, and I'm going to ask the same question there as well. But since you are the original author, you would also have to agree to a license change.

@prusnak
Copy link

prusnak commented May 12, 2015

I think it makes sense to use the same license as hidapi (i.e. triple-license GPLv3 and BSD and HIDAPI license). I am for this change.

@gbishop
Copy link
Owner

gbishop commented May 30, 2015

Make it whatever you want. I'll accept a pull request that fixes it. I hate licenses and the noise that surrounds them.

@ulrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks a lot.

prusnak pushed a commit to trezor/cython-hidapi that referenced this issue Jun 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants