Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Monthly Dev Dependencies #2250

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gardener-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot commented Jan 8, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@typescript-eslint/utils (source) devDependencies minor 8.16.0 -> 8.19.1
@vitest/coverage-v8 (source) devDependencies patch 2.1.7 -> 2.1.8
@vitest/eslint-plugin devDependencies patch 1.1.13 -> 1.1.24
@vitest/ui (source) devDependencies patch 2.1.7 -> 2.1.8
eslint (source) devDependencies minor 9.16.0 -> 9.17.0
eslint-plugin-jest devDependencies minor 28.9.0 -> 28.10.0
neostandard devDependencies minor ^0.11.7 -> ^0.12.0
rollup-plugin-visualizer devDependencies minor 5.12.0 -> 5.14.0
typescript (source) devDependencies patch 5.7.2 -> 5.7.3
vite (source) devDependencies patch 6.0.2 -> 6.0.7
vitest (source) devDependencies patch 2.1.7 -> 2.1.8
vitest-fetch-mock devDependencies patch 0.4.2 -> 0.4.3

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/utils)

v8.19.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for utils to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-indexed-object-style] don't report on indirect circular references (#​10537)
❤️ Thank You
  • Ronen Amiel

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.18.2

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for utils to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.18.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for utils to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.18.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
❤️ Thank You
  • rtritto

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.17.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for utils to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-v8)

v2.1.8

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
    View changes on GitHub
vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest (@​vitest/eslint-plugin)

v1.1.24

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v1.1.23

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • make rule message punctuation more consistent and address some typos (#​628) (31cae3b)

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.22...v1.1.23

v1.1.22

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • valid-title false positives when test.extend is used (#​584) (9c2670a)

v1.1.21

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Performance Improvements
  • only build regexp ones for detecting expectations (#​608) (448650c)

What's Changed

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.20...v1.1.21

v1.1.20

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.19...v1.1.20

v1.1.19

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

What's Changed

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.18...v1.1.19

v1.1.18

Compare Source

Features

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.17...v1.1.18

v1.1.17

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • expect.hasAssertions() / expect.assertions() - Does not work when using expect() bound to current test (#​595) (efe79c9)

What's Changed

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.16...v1.1.17

v1.1.16

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.15...v1.1.16

v1.1.15

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • padding-around-expect-groups doesn't detect expectTypeOf as an expect clause (#​588) (1138003)

What's Changed

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.14...v1.1.15

v1.1.14

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: vitest-dev/eslint-plugin-vitest@v1.1.13...v1.1.14

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.17.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
  • 67d683d fix: fix crash when message.fix is nullish (#​19168) (ntnyq)
  • c618707 fix: ignore vars with non-identifier references in no-useless-assignment (#​19200) (YeonJuan)
Documentation
  • 3c22d2a docs: update yoda to Yoda in yoda.md for consistency (#​19230) (루밀LuMir)
  • e0a2203 docs: add missing backticks to no-sequences (#​19233) (루밀LuMir)
  • 4cc4881 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 3db6fdf docs: [no-await-in-loop] expand on benefits and inapplicability (#​19211) (Kirk Waiblinger)
  • bf2a4f6 docs: add missing backticks to func-style (#​19227) (루밀LuMir)
  • ba098bd docs: add missing header to prefer-spread (#​19224) (루밀LuMir)
  • b607ae6 docs: update description of no-param-reassign (#​19220) (루밀LuMir)
  • 1eb424d docs: add missing backticks to prefer-destructuring (#​19223) (루밀LuMir)
  • 85998d1 docs: add missing backticks to no-unneeded-ternary (#​19222) (루밀LuMir)
  • b75b32c docs: add missing backticks to no-new-func (#​19219) (루밀LuMir)
  • a7700bc docs: add missing backticks to id-length (#​19217) (루밀LuMir)
  • e2bb429 docs: add missing backticks to complexity.md (#​19214) (루밀LuMir)
  • 045d716 docs: add missing ) to id-denylist (#​19213) (루밀LuMir)
  • 7fe4114 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • c743ba6 docs: add CSS language to no-restricted-syntax (#​19208) (Milos Djermanovic)
  • 1416d70 docs: add missing backticks to eqeqeq (#​19207) (루밀LuMir)
  • b950c1b docs: add missing backticks to prefer-object-spread (#​19206) (루밀LuMir)
  • 8a941cb docs: update docs and description of require-unicode-regexp (#​19205) (루밀LuMir)
  • cbab228 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • f2257ce docs: update comments and description of no-script-url (#​19203) (루밀LuMir)
  • 365f0f4 docs: add missing backtick to default-case-last (#​19202) (루밀LuMir)
  • e6b84f5 docs: add missing punctuation in document (#​19161) (루밀LuMir)
  • c88708e docs: replace quote with backtick in description of for-direction (#​19199) (루밀LuMir)
  • a76f233 docs: use higher contrast color tokens for code comments (#​19187) (Josh Goldberg ✨)
  • db19502 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
Chores
jest-community/eslint-plugin-jest (eslint-plugin-jest)

v28.10.0

Compare Source

Features
  • unbound-method: ignore functions passed to jest.mocked (#​1681) (d868636)
neostandard/neostandard (neostandard)

v0.12.0

Compare Source

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • re-enabled import rules are breaking change
🌟 Features
  • deps: update dependency eslint-plugin-promise to ^7.2.1 (#​223) (33184e8)
  • deps: update dependency eslint-plugin-react to ^7.37.2 (#​179) (11380cb)
  • deps: update dependency typescript-eslint to ^8.17.0 (#​224) (a2d3577)
  • re-enabled import rules are breaking change (dcf46c8)
  • reenabled import checking rules (eslint-plugin-import) (#​197) (629e936)
🩹 Fixes
btd/rollup-plugin-visualizer (rollup-plugin-visualizer)

v5.14.0

Compare Source

  • Return flamegraph

v5.13.1

Compare Source

v5.13.0

Compare Source

  • Remove flamegraph template
  • Merge #​191. Thanks to @​guillaumeduboc
  • Update deps
  • Switch jest -> vitest
  • Switch eslint -> oxlint
  • Add test for rolldown
  • Make node v18 min required
microsoft/TypeScript (typescript)

v5.7.3

Compare Source

vitejs/vite (vite)

v6.0.7

Compare Source

v6.0.6

Compare Source

v6.0.5

Compare Source

v6.0.4

Compare Source

v6.0.3

Compare Source

IanVS/vitest-fetch-mock (vitest-fetch-mock)

v0.4.3

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: IanVS/vitest-fetch-mock@v0.4.2...v0.4.3


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot added kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension renovate labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the needs/review Needs review label Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-robot
Copy link

@gardener-ci-robot Thank you for your contribution.

@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from e9d9bef to 368c54d Compare January 8, 2025 13:31
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 368c54d to d079eb2 Compare January 8, 2025 13:40
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from d079eb2 to 0cec21d Compare January 8, 2025 13:47
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 0cec21d to 35b0242 Compare January 8, 2025 13:55
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 35b0242 to 22f2b65 Compare January 8, 2025 14:04
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 22f2b65 to c926901 Compare January 8, 2025 14:13
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 7a8ce97 to c86a58f Compare January 8, 2025 20:50
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from c86a58f to c94ee98 Compare January 8, 2025 20:59
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from c94ee98 to b300414 Compare January 8, 2025 21:09
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from b300414 to 7c084f2 Compare January 8, 2025 21:17
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 7c084f2 to 7902e97 Compare January 8, 2025 21:24
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 7902e97 to 247aa1b Compare January 8, 2025 21:32
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from 247aa1b to b1f7c15 Compare January 8, 2025 21:41
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-ci-robot gardener-ci-robot force-pushed the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch from b1f7c15 to 8ddc566 Compare January 8, 2025 21:49
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 8, 2025
@petersutter
Copy link
Member

/close

@gardener-robot
Copy link

@petersutter Branch renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies has been deleted.

@gardener-robot gardener-robot deleted the renovate/monthly-dev-dependencies branch January 8, 2025 21:51
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Jan 8, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Jan 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else renovate size/xl Size of pull request is huge (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants