Skip to content

docs: fix /implement references to /code in user guide - #392

Closed
ascerra wants to merge 1 commit into
fullsend-ai:mainfrom
ascerra:docs/fix-implement-to-code-command
Closed

docs: fix /implement references to /code in user guide#392
ascerra wants to merge 1 commit into
fullsend-ai:mainfrom
ascerra:docs/fix-implement-to-code-command

Conversation

@ascerra

@ascerra ascerra commented Apr 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The bugfix workflow guide referenced /implement as the slash command for the code agent, but the actual wired command in the shim workflow is /code. Update all three occurrences to match the deployed behavior.

Made-with: Cursor

The bugfix workflow guide referenced `/implement` as the slash command
for the code agent, but the actual wired command in the shim workflow
is `/code`. Update all three occurrences to match the deployed behavior.

Made-with: Cursor
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Site preview

Preview: https://967aa1eb-site.fullsend-ai.workers.dev

Commit: a5509ccdd4d9262d61bc54d5f75ab757762dca85

@fullsend-ai-review fullsend-ai-review Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review: #392

Head SHA: a5509cc
Timestamp: 2026-04-23T00:00:00Z
Outcome: approve

Summary

Clean documentation fix. All three /implement/code replacements in the bugfix workflow user guide are correct — the deployed shim workflow (internal/scaffold/fullsend-repo/templates/shim-workflow.yaml lines 67–68) confirms /code is the actual wired command. No correctness, security, or injection concerns. Approving.

Findings

Info

  • [intent-alignment] docs/ADRs/0002-initial-fullsend-design.md — ADR 0002 still references /implement in ~6 places. This PR correctly scopes itself to the user guide, and ADRs are typically historical records, but if the team treats ADRs as living documents the terminology inconsistency is worth a follow-up.

Footer

Outcome: approve
This review applies to SHA a5509ccdd4d9262d61bc54d5f75ab757762dca85. Any push to the PR head clears this review and requires a new evaluation.

@ralphbean

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I think I just got this in at #427

@ascerra

ascerra commented Apr 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing this PR as the work was done here #427

@ascerra ascerra closed this Apr 24, 2026
@github-actions
github-actions Bot deleted the docs/fix-implement-to-code-command branch May 24, 2026 06:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants