Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion schemas/retro-result.schema.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
"summary": {
"type": "string",
"minLength": 1,
"maxLength": 16384,
"maxLength": 32768,
"description": "Markdown summary to post as a comment on the originating PR/issue. Links to each filed proposal issue."
},
"proposals": {
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion skills/retro-analysis/SKILL.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Use multiple searches with different keyword combinations if the first returns n

**Do not file "evidence for" issues.** When your analysis produces evidence that supports or corroborates an existing open issue, put it in your `summary` field — not in a new proposal. Do not title proposals "Evidence for #XXXX" or use any other framing that makes a duplicate look like a new issue. The summary is posted as a comment on the originating PR or issue, which preserves the data point. Filing evidence as a separate proposal creates noise that compounds across retro runs.

When skipping, note the duplicate in your `summary` field — include the issue number and what specific evidence this retro found, so the human understands what was filtered and why.
When skipping, note the duplicate in your `summary` field — include the issue number and what specific evidence this retro found, so the human understands what was filtered and why. Keep evidence notes concise — one sentence per existing issue with the issue number and a brief description of the new evidence. The summary field has a schema length limit; prioritize the most impactful evidence if space is constrained.

## Localization guidance

Expand Down
Loading