Minor [Feature] Updated Issue and PR templates

[vedansh-5]

Closes #98

Summary by Sourcery

Revamp GitHub Issue and Pull Request templates to include standardized metadata, structured sections, and checklists for bug reports and contributions.

Documentation:

• Add frontmatter and reorganize ISSUE_TEMPLATE with titled sections for actual/expected behavior, screenshots, reproduction steps, possible solutions, and contribution intent
• Enhance PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE with standardized fix footer, change summary section, screenshots/demo area, contribution checklist, and reviewer notes

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's Guide

This PR overhauls the GitHub issue and pull request templates to a more structured format, adding frontmatter, standardized headings, emojis, checklists, and automation directives for clearer contributor guidance and streamlined issue/PR workflows.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Revamped ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md to a structured, frontmatter-driven bug/feature template	Added YAML frontmatter (name, about, title, labels, assignees) Introduced emoji-based section headings (Actual Behaviour, Expected Behaviour, Screenshots, Steps to Reproduce, Possible Solution, Would You Like to Work on It) Formatted reproducibility steps and contributor assignment prompt	.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
Overhauled PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md with detailed sections, checklist, and automations	Standardized fix directive to “Fixes #” Added sections for Summary of Changes, Screenshots/Demo, and Reviewer Notes Included a testing/documentation checklist and markdown separators	.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

Assessment against linked issues

Issue	Objective	Addressed	Explanation

Possibly linked issues

• Enhance Issue and PR templates #98: The PR updates the issue and PR templates by rewriting the template files.

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @vedansh-5 - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

• Consider splitting the unified "Bug Report / Feature Request" template into two separate templates to make triaging and labeling more straightforward.
• The blank assignees: field can be removed or clarified to avoid confusion about assignment expectations.
• Standardize heading levels and emoji usage across both templates to align with existing project style and improve readability.

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}