-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(grpc): remove connect method #54
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Dav-14 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the project's dependency and gRPC communication mechanism. The Earthfile now uses a newer version of the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
Client->>Server: Join Request
Server-->>Client: Stream Orders
Note over Client,Server: Connection established using new Join method
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
.earthly/values.yaml
is excluded by!**/*.yaml
go.mod
is excluded by!**/*.mod
internal/generated/agent.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
,!**/generated/**
,!**/*.pb.go
,!**/generated/**
internal/generated/agent_grpc.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
,!**/generated/**
,!**/*.pb.go
,!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Earthfile
(1 hunks)agent.proto
(1 hunks)internal/membership_client.go
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
agent.proto (1)
22-22
: Good use of reserved fields to maintain backward compatibility
Declaring a field as reserved ensures no future message definition will inadvertently reuse this field number, preventing unintended collisions in serialized data across different versions of the protocol.
Earthfile (1)
3-3
: Verify compatibility with Earthly v0.19.0
Upgrading from v0.16.2
to v0.19.0
may introduce breaking changes or behavior differences. Be sure to validate the build and carefully review the Earthly changelog to confirm the new version is fully compatible with the existing build steps.
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ type membershipClient struct { | |||
stopped chan struct{} | |||
|
|||
serverClient generated.ServerClient | |||
connectClient generated.Server_ConnectClient | |||
connectClient generated.Server_JoinClient |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Remaining Connect references need to be updated
The codebase still contains several references to the old Connect
RPC that need to be updated to use the new Join
RPC:
internal/membership_client.go
: Theconnect
method and related fields (connectContext
,connectCancel
,connectMetadata
) should be renamed to reflect the newJoin
RPCinternal/generated/agent.pb.go
: Contains old generated code withConnectRequest
type and related methods that should be regenerated using the new protobuf definitions
🔗 Analysis chain
Updated gRPC client field to match new Join RPC
The connectClient
field now uses generated.Server_JoinClient
to reflect the new Join
streaming method. Verify other parts of the codebase no longer reference the removed Connect
RPC.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old Connect RPC
rg -A 3 "ConnectClient"
rg -A 3 "Connect("
Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old Connect RPC with proper regex escaping
rg -A 3 "ConnectClient"
rg -A 3 "Connect\("
# Also search for any Connect-related types/interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ interface {
Connect($$$)
$$$
}'
# Search for Connect method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'func ($_ $_) Connect($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching in the generated code directory first to understand the interface changes
fd generated.pb.go --exec cat {}
# Also search for any remaining references to Connect in the entire codebase
rg -i "connect" --type go
Length of output: 3062
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you might also consider replacing c.connectClient.RecvMsg(msg)
calls with c.joinClient.Recv()
to take advantage of the the new interface
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@laouji, that’s an excellent suggestion. Leveraging the typed Recv()
method can indeed simplify the receiving logic. For example, you could do something like this:
for {
msg, err := c.connectClient.Recv()
if err != nil {
if err == io.EOF {
// handle graceful closure
return
}
logging.FromContext(ctx).Errorf("Stream closed with error: %v", err)
return err
}
if msg.GetPing() != nil {
c.sendPong(ctx)
continue
}
select {
case c.orders <- msg:
case <-ctx.Done():
return ctx.Err()
}
}
Renaming c.connectClient
to c.joinClient
(along with connectContext
to joinContext
and so on) can also help clarify that the code now uses the Join
RPC instead of Connect
.
If you’d like to keep the current approach, though, that’s also valid; just do note that switching to Recv()
offers a more straightforward, strongly-typed API that might reduce boilerplate and potential confusion. Let me know if you’d like any more help with this!
68aa380
to
3692f33
Compare
No description provided.