Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DxccStatus: select LoTW, Paper or Both, #508

Closed
foldynl opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

DxccStatus: select LoTW, Paper or Both, #508

foldynl opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@foldynl
Copy link
Owner

foldynl commented Nov 20, 2024

From discussions:

The easiest way I could think to implement that would be to have an overall option on like a confirmed option where you could select LoTW, Paper or Both, then that could be taken into account in queries like the DxccStatus. What are your thoughts Ladislav? I do see value to that especially now that ARRL still isn't accepting paper cards for DXCC only LoTW.
@foldynl foldynl added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 20, 2024
@aa5sh aa5sh mentioned this issue Nov 21, 2024
Closed
@foldynl foldynl moved this from Todo to In Progress in v0.41.0 Roadmap (Closed) Dec 4, 2024
foldynl added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2024
@foldynl
Fixed #508 - DxccStatus: select based on LoTW, Paper eQSL also for Me…
45cb2ab 
…mbershipQE
@foldynl foldynl moved this from In Progress to Done - branch: testing_0.41 in v0.41.0 Roadmap (Closed) Dec 8, 2024
foldynl added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2024
@foldynl
Fixed #508 - DxccStatus: select based on LoTW, Paper eQSL also for Me…
e05c576 
…mbershipQE (2)

LogParam must be called from the same thread as it is created
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
v0.41.0 Roadmap (Closed)
Status: Done - branch: testing_0.41
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@foldynl