-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve Unicode handling when writing to an ostream on Windows #2994
Merged
Merged
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0cbc004
Refactor detail::print() by splitting into two functions.
dimztimz e17de67
Make Unicode handing when writing to std::ostream more robust.
dimztimz e6d1489
Fix Unicode handling when writing to an ostream on GCC on Windows
dimztimz 382f608
Add TODO note about detail::is_utf8()
dimztimz fe2e381
Fix warning -Wundef
dimztimz 4230d74
Fix for non-Windows OSs
dimztimz 7a94e60
Fix building as DLL on Windows
dimztimz 5fd371e
Refactor
dimztimz 72737d0
Suppress warning
dimztimz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest checking include presence with
FMT_HAS_INCLUDE
to make it more robust.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why? In case some future GCC removes these files? The checks for Windows and libstdc++ should be still there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the files are remove the check will be broken in either case but the removal is easier to support with
FMT_HAS_INCLUDE
. In general testing against features is more robust than testing against platforms.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I suggest something like
and later:
This will avoid duplicating checks and make the whole thing more robust (including to removal of headers).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That will incur additional penalty during compilation when one does not use libstdc++ on Windows, e.g. in MSVC. There is additional filesystem access. The header
ext/stdio_filebuf.h
is very much platform specific thing so it is better to check for platform. Also think of the scenario when someone under MSVC somehow putsext/stdio_filebuf.h
. The check for the platform must be there, IMO.See
Its there since GCC v3.1 and will remain there because it is stable extension (not experimental). The older supported GCC compiler of FMT is v4.8.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough.