[camera] Remove a potential deadlock on Android

[g123k]

Here is the scenario fixed by this PR:

• Open the camera in a Flutter app
• Move this app to the background (= no dispose method called)
• Open a third-party app requiring the camera

In that case, the native Android code will call onDisconnected from CameraDevice.StateCallback.
In this call, the close() method is launched but never ends because stopBackgroundThread is blocked in the join() method.

To prevent this, I have simply added a timeout.
2500 milliseconds is totally arbitrary. I can change it.

Pre-launch Checklist

• I read the Contributor Guide and followed the process outlined there for submitting PRs.
• I read the Tree Hygiene wiki page, which explains my responsibilities.
• I read and followed the relevant style guides and ran the auto-formatter. (Unlike the flutter/flutter repo, the flutter/plugins repo does use dart format.)
• I signed the CLA.
• The title of the PR starts with the name of the plugin surrounded by square brackets, e.g. [shared_preferences]
• I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description above.
• I updated pubspec.yaml with an appropriate new version according to the pub versioning philosophy, or this PR is exempt from version changes.
• I updated CHANGELOG.md to add a description of the change, following repository CHANGELOG style.
• I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with ///).
• I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is test-exempt.
• All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

[flutter-dashboard]

It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat (don't just cc him here, he won't see it! He's on Discord!).

If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix?

Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing.

[stuartmorgan]

Thanks for the submission!

In the future, please do not delete the checklist that is in the PR template; it is there for a reason. This PR is missing required elements described in the checklist (I’ve restored it to the PR description), which need to be addressed before it moves forward with review.

I am marking the PR as a Draft. Please review the checklist, updating the PR as appropriate, and when that’s complete please feel free to mark the PR as ready for review.

[stuartmorgan]

Since this is marked as a draft and hasn't been updated in several months I'm going to close it to clean out our review queue. Please don't hesitate to submit a new PR if you decide to revisit this. Thanks!