-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
root_dir/@id parameter documentation is not empirically correct #3552
Comments
Hmm, probably you are right. fluentd/lib/fluent/plugin/buf_file.rb Lines 84 to 87 in 8229ed9
We should update the document. |
When the specified path is file, it's not multi workers available: fluentd/lib/fluent/plugin/buf_file.rb Lines 94 to 104 in 8229ed9
In this case, fluentd correctly rejects it: fluentd/lib/fluent/plugin/buf_file.rb Lines 114 to 119 in 8229ed9
|
Anyway the document isn't correct, we should fix it. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 30 days |
This issue was automatically closed because of stale in 30 days |
Fixed in fluent/fluentd-docs-gitbook#386 |
Describe the bug
From https://docs.fluentd.org/deployment/multi-process-workers#root_dir-id-parameter:
That does not seem to be true at all. Is this oudated?
I can specify
path
for a file buffer with multi-process workers and td-agent will not complain whatsoever, and will create directories for each worker automatically.To Reproduce
Use config below.
Will result in:
Expected behavior
If I "cannot" configure this, then an error should be raised and td-agent should not start.
Your Environment
Your Configuration
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: