We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check CONTRIBUTING guideline first and here is the list to help us investigate the problem.
Fluentd v1
All supported Operating Systems
Nope. It is feature request for record_accessor.
record_accessor
Currently, record_accessor does not expose internal @keys instance. We want to use this variable in fluent-plugin-anonymizer like this:
@keys
https://github.com/cosmo0920/fluent-plugin-anonymizer/blob/0bb45b93cebc996b6ccb13b5b7a2a71b4682cf14/lib/fluent/plugin/filter_anonymizer.rb#L242-L249
Now, @keys does not handle keys correctly when using $['your']['some']['key'] notation. We also want to use this variable (or API?) above use case.
$['your']['some']['key']
Already supported above. 🙇♂️
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
LGTM > Expose @keys
Sorry, something went wrong.
Expose record_accessor internal instance @keys variable. Fix fluent…
0004370
…#1806
8e7358f
Merge pull request #1808 from cosmo0920/expose-internal-record_access…
63c61d7
…or-variable Expose record_accessor internal instance `@keys` variable. Fix #1806
No branches or pull requests
Check CONTRIBUTING guideline first and here is the list to help us investigate the problem.
Fluentd v1
All supported Operating Systems
Nope. It is feature request for
record_accessor
.Currently,
record_accessor
does not expose internal@keys
instance.We want to use this variable in fluent-plugin-anonymizer like this:
https://github.com/cosmo0920/fluent-plugin-anonymizer/blob/0bb45b93cebc996b6ccb13b5b7a2a71b4682cf14/lib/fluent/plugin/filter_anonymizer.rb#L242-L249
Additional request
Now,@keys
does not handle keys correctly when using$['your']['some']['key']
notation.We also want to use this variable (or API?) above use case.
Already supported above. 🙇♂️
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: