Skip to content

Conversation

@weefuzzy
Copy link
Member

@tremblap
Copy link
Member

a max-specific question: when I choose attrui for select the full list is there, which is great.

if I type in there whatever, it autocorrects to kurtosis though, which is a bug?

Also when I send a message select mean the attrui corrects to kurtosis again.

finally, when I ask for mean only, I get 2 values (the kurtosis and its derivative - I expect 2 values but not the kurtosis :))

reset works as expected - I get back the full list in the attrui

@tremblap
Copy link
Member

(more info: I get the same behaviour in Pd)

@weefuzzy
Copy link
Member Author

Weird – I thought that was something I'd fixed early in development. I must have not paid attention when pushing / branch switching and junked some changes by accident. Anyway, it should work now.

@tremblap
Copy link
Member

I filled the feedback in the core repo flucoma/flucoma-core#108 - it worked but broke everything else strangely

@jamesb93 jamesb93 modified the milestones: beta6, beta7 Mar 28, 2022
@weefuzzy weefuzzy marked this pull request as ready for review April 21, 2022 13:50
@jamesb93
Copy link
Member

jamesb93 commented May 1, 2022

I'm not sure if this related to the Max bit of code or the core bit of code @weefuzzy or what the limitations and expectations are but...

When I set the @select in the box I get what I expect, but sending messages on the fly for the rt versions updates the parameter but it is not reflected in the output. I get a similar behaviour with the buffer versions, where putting what I want in the box gives me I expect, however the @features buffer doesn't resize as I would expect when changing it via message or in the box. Patch to demonstrate:

<pre><code>
----------begin_max5_patcher----------
1061.3ocuX0saixCD85jmBKtakxhv176dUeH9t6SqpbHlDRM1QXSSqVs6y9N
1PZS2RHzBoRsgvvfGeNLyYFxuVtvas5It1C8Cz+iVr3WKWrvYxZXQ24K7pXO
kKXZmad4ppJtz3sp8ZF9SFmc52PR0QDS+.pPUinHytR4VMZciA9JGNVTvqQG
KEBTMuhUJAeQLDAkuiIkbgO5+.2xURCr7ZjPod.UqZ1tS7LXstlmabqrcwJJ
q0lWuUMXz54oMknTxyUMR2NKpy3gZtFVYloTIuuWOjMUkRA23.J9UipFyIqA
cVK23.sZ89uSCNE1CLStEz2a2qsbZVRfevJDgDYOfibmkD5Gf9o8d98xk1OV
MQtm7sNFA3b8JzQNRy4nRfEekh7cWDsUo1zKMQlDIPxFfDRxbvFmj4G8BIPo
eRRnPnfsyovAYDULWbhGO.HurWqYUbCu9dtjsVvOGbstad9.uEDddqPdqYxs
dne1C9SFB+IwVDGhSr3OpKi3SBeI+HDv2kBTJKT+AU3MdRH6R.EHXfQAzJJ0
tiuXXLew9eoMkpOVJZHVJl3xKhCcYIAzIQSWpTA2JSYECzsUDL4FaEiSXRar
eti8HGDvdjIZ3ZvcPoo2RF5zJYBGfLBCboL3vyKYBS9jjQE.V1V96HCMWXUU
0OvOhz.kv1.JtBgpnXExkp2G.I8BP7EKa5MQfbc4BBMvg81hm4tdosczGqhg
b0JlKqOLTShzzvyx7ilVhOzu0nje.Tg+LhgWDn3jqWh20Hf3PMIbdevVHZJ2
3COd0Gf3VyD5crC7+ftqKYOGp7gAIDLizJAbmV0TmyQ6Q2UvYlF3penbB5fL
zaDF6ktFihHNxRWzaagvdzdkbq3YeV4WTMANbDoJcBfAjIg8KI.FF4GGkEkQ
QA9ve2L8N7Pk+Dba4ej64a1MBozL+rvXHIB8JnwTvVVPZDhj.CkFShxRBg1L
D+HZ.3BB13.+SSCRI1tOQgwAgiuU3bvboCQbccEa0QnItyxl2xi7myEf5QXX
vbjbnK2JYhdAZ7..M1AML08RDw2DYfVYy2pYNGx.mlgrWLGcULSBaewIb7Mo
p3z.Psy9XmC5lIALjXGIMygxNMOL9q5I7k5J1ME3MOA.ODoPwmkAPhylDovL
l5lxYdrH6hdVdj2Gqm.85Y+NnSS6ehP2h5jg+me.G25Ys+V9ncRmtszoWGCk
9xdaCjBTJc+9Hm6DLPG5Rb9XijcLG6hLbjhlgHYeyhqFI7bDIbxWVjFSff9S
H7DCzXdJkNCwIdL.5M9np2vckZASJvgiOvS6IFcDAZNRMhGeb9WlD+NoD1gC
Oxq0c2sKlfH5dky8zUtSKksm5F3yql+X4I+chhdrZPJy.5XvaR4j5dJtsymW
kBBrDzfaiMfVHjNAZIHvpOvZAlSGe4uW9WrF3kMB
-----------end_max5_patcher-----------
</code></pre>

@weefuzzy
Copy link
Member Author

weefuzzy commented May 1, 2022

It's more of an everything-thing, and gets solved by the max-params PR, insofar as list sizes (in Max / PD) and buffer sizes (in all) should respond properly.

@weefuzzy weefuzzy merged commit 02fef8e into flucoma:dev May 3, 2022
@weefuzzy weefuzzy deleted the enhance/choices-param branch May 3, 2022 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants