Update Docker CI tags to 20260322-ff86ea0#2854
Conversation
flashinfer-bot
requested review from
aleozlx,
bkryu,
cyx-6,
jimmyzho,
kahyunnam,
nv-yunzheq,
saltyminty,
sricketts,
yongwww,
yyihuang and
yzh119
as code owners
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request updates the continuous integration environment by refreshing the Docker image tags to their latest available versions. This ensures that all CI workflows run with the most current dependencies and configurations, promoting consistency and leveraging recent platform improvements across various CUDA versions. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates Docker CI image tags. I've identified a potential critical issue with the new tag 20260322-ff86ea0, where the year 2026 appears to be a typo for 2024. If an image with this tag doesn't exist, it will break the CI. A suggestion to correct this has been provided in the review comments.
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126: 20260322-ff86ea0 | ||
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128: 20260322-ff86ea0 | ||
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129: 20260322-ff86ea0 | ||
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130: 20260322-ff86ea0 | ||
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu132: 20260322-ff86ea0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The year in the Docker image tags appears to be 2026, which is in the future. This is likely a typo and should probably be 2024. If a Docker image with the tag 20260322-ff86ea0 does not exist, this will cause CI pipelines to fail when trying to pull the image.
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126: 20240322-ff86ea0
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128: 20240322-ff86ea0
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129: 20240322-ff86ea0
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130: 20240322-ff86ea0
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu132: 20240322-ff86ea0
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughUpdated Docker image tag mappings for flashinfer CI CUDA variants 12.6, 12.8, 12.9, and 13.0 with a newer build identifier, and added a new image tag entry for CUDA 13.2. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment Tip You can get early access to new features in CodeRabbit.Enable the |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ci/docker-tags.yml (1)
5-5: Consider wiringcu132into PR/Jenkins test matrices as follow-up.Adding the
cu132tag here is correct, but the provided workflow/Jenkins snippets indicatecu132is not yet covered in PR test matrix and AOT Jenkins job definitions. That leaves this image variant under-validated in regular CI.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@ci/docker-tags.yml` at line 5, The new docker tag flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu132 was added to ci/docker-tags.yml but CI matrices don't exercise this variant; update the PR test matrix and AOT Jenkins job definitions to include the cu132 flavor so it is validated by PR runs and nightly/AOT pipelines—locate references to the PR workflow matrix (e.g., the job that enumerates CUDA variants in the GitHub Actions workflow) and the AOT Jenkins job definition that lists docker tags and add the cu132 entry so both PR and Jenkins matrices cover this image.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@ci/docker-tags.yml`:
- Line 5: The new docker tag flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu132 was added to
ci/docker-tags.yml but CI matrices don't exercise this variant; update the PR
test matrix and AOT Jenkins job definitions to include the cu132 flavor so it is
validated by PR runs and nightly/AOT pipelines—locate references to the PR
workflow matrix (e.g., the job that enumerates CUDA variants in the GitHub
Actions workflow) and the AOT Jenkins job definition that lists docker tags and
add the cu132 entry so both PR and Jenkins matrices cover this image.
3 participants
This PR updates the Docker CI image tags to the latest version:
20260322-ff86ea0Updated images:
Auto-generated by release-ci-docker workflow
Summary by CodeRabbit